Abstract:Abstract Introduction Light is the most potent signal for the circadian regulation of sleep. To quantify light’s biological impact via melanopic Equivalent Daylight Illuminance (EDI), photic intensity is weighted based on the spectral sensitivity of melanopsin. This metric for light and time-of-day specific threshold recommendations support development, standardization, and replication of studies of the physiological effects of light. Light measurement outside the lab poses many unique challenges (e.g. greater variability in timing, intensity, spectrum; individual factors; technology limitations). Thus, consistent methods for measurement and reporting are important for maximizing the utility of emerging tools. Methods A framework for assessing and reporting light in field studies was developed, incorporating: 1) factors that influence light exposure, 2) methods for capturing the most significant factors, 3) strategies for addressing unique tradeoffs and challenges, and 4) an initial step-by-step protocol for measuring and reporting lighting characteristics in field studies of the physiological effects of light. This framework was applied in multiple study protocols to inform development and refinement. Results All studies used both static and continuous measures, along with subjective assessments. In one study, lighting was not homogenous and therefore position and location in the space mattered (melanopic EDI seated vs standing, 133.84 vs 221.91 lux; between workstations (seated), 133.84 vs 62.29 lux). In a second study, lighting was more homogenous but varied by time-on-shift; thus, continuous measures with a stationary meter were used. In a third study, subjective assessment of behaviors that influence photic exposure patterns over the past month indicated individuals likely did not meet nighttime light recommendations (melanopic EDI < 1 lux): 73% used their phone in bed often or always before sleep; and 20% often or always checked their phone if awakened from sleep. Conclusion When measuring and reporting light in the field, a one-size-fits-all approach is impossible, but some level of standardization is necessary. The proposed multi-level framework expands on recent lab-based guidelines by making adaptations for field studies, facilitating the evidence-based translation of our fundamental understanding of the effects of light on sleep and circadian health. Support (if any) CDMRP JPC-5 Fatigue Countermeasures Working Group (#66619).

Towards an evidence-based integrative lighting score: a proposed multi-level approach

Personalized Office Lighting for Circadian Health and Improved Sleep

Syncing with the Sky: Daylight-Driven Circadian Lighting Design

Recommendations for daytime, evening, and nighttime indoor light exposure to best support physiology, sleep, and wakefulness in healthy adults

The Lighting Environment, Its Metrology, and Non-visual Responses

Temporal tuning of illuminance and spectrum: Effect of a full-day dynamic lighting pattern on well-being, performance and sleep in simulated office environment

Spatial and Spectral Illumination Design for Energy-Efficient Circadian Lighting

0353 Shining Light on Photic Measurement for Sleep and Circadian Field Studies

A Proposed Lighting-Design Space: Circadian Effect Versus Visual Illuminance

Effects of dim-evening lighting optimised for geographical orientation versus standard lighting on mental health: protocol paper for a quasiexperimental study in a psychiatric hospital

Protocol for a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional cohort study to assess personal light exposure

Spectral optimisation and a novel lighting-design space based on circadian stimulus

Light-environment interactions and integrative lighting design: Connecting visual, non-visual and energy requirements in a case study experiment

Assessment of the Light Exposures of Shift-working Nurses in London and Dortmund in Relation to Recommendations for Sleep and Circadian Health

Circadian lighting effect for inpatients with schizophrenia: A prospective cohort study

Mathematical Analysis of Light-sensitivity Related Challenges in Assessment of the Intrinsic Period of the Human Circadian Pacemaker

Quantifying the Effects of Luminous Properties on Human Visual and Non-Visual Responses in Indoor Environments: an Integrative Lighting Network

Human-Centric Lighting Design: A Framework for Supporting Healthy Circadian Rhythm Grounded in Established Knowledge in Interior Spaces

Evaluation Of Window Lighting Considering The Circadian Effect

Individual differences in light sensitivity affect sleep and circadian rhythms

Diurnal Circadian Lighting Accumulation Model: A Predictor of the Human Circadian Phase Shift Phenotype