Reference gene selection for expression studies in the reproductive axis tissues of Magang geese at different reproductive stages under light treatment

Bei-Bei Zhang,Xu Shen,Xiu-Jin Li,Yun-Bo Tian,Hong-Jia Ouyang,Yun-Mao Huang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87169-z
IF: 4.6
2021-04-07
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Abstract In quantitative PCR research, appropriate reference genes are key to determining accurate mRNA expression levels. In order to screen the reference genes suitable for detecting gene expression in tissues of the reproductive axis, a total of 420 (males and females = 1:5) 3-year-old Magang geese were selected and subjected to light treatment. The hypothalamus, pituitary and testicular tissues were subsequently collected at different stages. Ten genes including HPRT1 , GAPDH , ACTB , LDHA , SDHA , B2M , TUBB4 , TFRC , RPS2 and RPL4 were selected as candidate reference genes. The expression of these genes in goose reproductive axis tissues was detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR. The ΔCT, geNorm, NormFinder and BestKeeper algorithms were applied to sort gene expression according to stability. The results showed that ACTB and TUBB4 were the most suitable reference genes for the hypothalamic tissue of Magang goose in the three breeding stages; HPRT1 and RPL4 for pituitary tissue; and HPRT1 and LDHA for testicular tissue. For all three reproductive axis tissues, ACTB was the most suitable reference gene, whereas the least stable reference gene was GAPDH . Altogether, these results can provide references for tissue expression studies in geese under light treatment.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the following issues: 1. **Screening suitable reference genes**: Screening for stable reference genes suitable for gene expression studies in the reproductive axis tissues (hypothalamus, pituitary, and testis) of Magang geese under different light treatment conditions. 2. **Evaluating the effectiveness of different algorithms**: Conducting stability analysis of candidate reference genes using four different algorithms (ΔCT, geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper) and determining the most suitable combination of reference genes. 3. **Validating the effectiveness of reference genes**: Selecting the most stable and the least stable reference genes to verify their effectiveness in actual gene expression studies, particularly focusing on the expression level changes of the FSHR gene at different reproductive stages.