Contemporary Outcomes of a National Fetal Spina Bifida Surgery Service

Charlotte C. Kik,Yada Kunpalin,Abhaya V. Kulkarni,Abby Varghese,Nimrah Abbasi,Greg Ryan,Philip L. J. Dekoninck,Paige T. Church,Armaan Malhotra,Kamini Raghuram,Edmond Kelly,Tim Van Mieghem
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6689
2024-10-21
Prenatal Diagnosis
Abstract:Objective To assess contemporary outcomes of fetuses who underwent open fetal spina bifida surgery in Canada. Methods Our clinical program prospectively collected outcomes of all consecutive fetuses who underwent open fetal spina bifida closure at the Ontario Fetal Center in Toronto and who were at least 1 year of age at the time of postnatal follow‐up. We gathered information on the need for hydrocephalus treatment, motor function, bladder function, as well as neurodevelopment (Ages and Stages Questionnaire and Bayley's scales of infant development). Developmental outcomes were categorized as "Typical Development," "Possible Delay," or "Significantly Delayed." Results Between 2017 and 2022, 41 fetuses underwent open fetal spina bifida closure. Twenty‐four patients (58.5%) responded to the questionnaire at a median age of 46.5 months. Eight children (33.3%) required CSF diversion procedures. Bladder management included clean intermittent catheterization (43.5%), spontaneous voiding (34.8%), or both (21.7%), with 43.5% needing medication for overactive bladder. All patients could sit independently, with 50% walking outside and 50% crawling indoors. Among those walking outdoors (50%), 25% did so without orthotics or aid, 58.3% with orthotics, and 16.7% required additional walking aids. Most children demonstrated typical communication and problem‐solving skills (79.2%), while gross motor development was significantly delayed in 91.7% of cases. Fine motor skills varied, with 56.5% showing typical development and 34.8% possibly experiencing delays. Conclusions This study showed a mixed developmental profile among patients who underwent open fetal spina bifida repair, consistent with the MOMs trial findings.
genetics & heredity,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?