Abstract:Recruiters increasingly cybervet job applicants by checking their social media profiles. Theory (i.e., the political affiliation model, PAM) and research show that during cybervetting, recruiters are exposed to job-unrelated information such as political affiliation, which might trigger similarity-attraction effects and bias hireability judgments. However, as the PAM was developed in a more polarized two-party political system, it is pivotal to test and refine the PAM in a multiparty context. Therefore, we asked working professionals from the United States (two-party context, <i>N</i> = 266) and Germany (multiparty context, <i>N</i> = 747) to rate an applicant's hireability after cybervetting a LinkedIn profile that was manipulated in a between-subjects design (party affiliation by individuating information). Key tenets of the PAM could be transferred to multiparty contexts: The political similarity-attraction effect predicted hireability judgments beyond job-related individuating information, especially regarding organizational citizenship behavior. In addition, in a multiparty context, these biasing effects of political similarity and liking were not attenuated. Yet, there were also differences: In a multiparty context, political similarity had to be operationalized in terms of political value similarity and recruiters' political interest emerged as a significant moderator of the effects. So, this study refines the PAM by showing in multiparty contexts the importance of (a) a values-based perspective (instead of a behavioral political affiliation perspective) and (b) political interest (instead of identification). Accordingly, we provide a more nuanced understanding of when political affiliation similarity contributes to perceived overall similarity in affecting liking and hireability judgments in cybervetting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Every vote you make: Attachment and state culture predict bipartisanship in U.S. Congress

Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment

Influencing a Polarized and Connected Legislature

The rise of partisanship and super-cooperators in the U.S. House of Representatives

Tell Me Who You Vote for, and I'll Tell You Who You Are? The Associations of Political Orientation With Personality and Prosocial Behavior and the Plausibility of Evolutionary Approaches

Follower-Followee Network, Communication Networks, and Vote Agreement of the U.S. Members of Congress

Attractiveness vs. Partisan stereotypes

Why are U.S. Parties So Polarized? A "Satisficing" Dynamical Model

Multiway Alignment of Political Attitudes

Partisan Asymmetries in Online Political Activity

How Similar Are Elected Politicians and Their Constituents? Quantitative Evidence From Online Social Networks

Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides

Incorporating emotion into cue-based political judgment modeling.

Testing the social pressure hypothesis: Does in-party social pressure reduce out-party empathy?

Politics speak louder than skills: Political similarity effects in hireability judgments in multiparty contexts and the role of political interest.

Registered report: Cognitive ability, but not cognitive reflection, predicts expressing greater political animosity and favouritism

Asymmetry in Political Geography and Compactness in Districting: a Computational Analysis of Bias

Network Structure Explains the Impact of Attitudes on Voting Decisions

Twitter Language Use Reflects Psychological Differences between Democrats and Republicans

A Statistical Model of Bipartite Networks: Application to Cosponsorship in the United States Senate

Assessing differences in legislators' revealed preferences: A case study on the 107th U.S. Senate