Abstract:Objective: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) placement is a routinely performed invasive procedure in hospital settings with an unacceptably high failure rate that can result in significant costs. This investigation aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of using long peripheral catheters (LPC) versus standard short peripheral catheters (SPC) in the difficult vascular access (DVA) population. Methods: A secondary analysis was performed of a randomized control trial that compared a 20-gauge 4.78 cm SPC to a 20-gauge 6.35 cm SPC for the endpoint of survival. This study assessed cost-effectiveness of the comparative interventions. Costs associated with increased hospitalization length of stay due to PIVC failure, including labor, materials, equipment, and treatment delays were estimated by utilizing healthcare resource utilization data. Cost-effectiveness of the LPC was analyzed through the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve, and the incremental net benefit. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results during the time interval of PIVC insertion. Results: Among the 257 patients, the average total cost for therapy was lower in the LPC group compared to the SPC group ($400 vs $521; mean difference -$121, 95% bootstrapped CI -$461 to $225). A marginally significant absolute difference of complication averted was found for LPC versus SPC (10.8%, p = 0.07). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for LPC as compared with SPC was -$1123 (95% bootstrapped CI -$8652 to $5964) per complication averted. In a willingness to pay (WTP) analysis, as WTP = $0, the incremental net benefit (INB) $121 was positive, indicating LPC was less costly. Analysis of PIVCs that survived ⩽48 h (n = 134) demonstrated a lower average total cost for therapy among the LPC group ($418 vs $531; mean difference -$113, 95% bootstrapped CI -$507 to $282). Forty-seven of 66 (71.2%) LPCs did not experience a complication, compared with 37 of 68 (54.4%) SPCs, resulting in a significant absolute difference of complication adverted of 16.8% (p = 0.04). In addition, with a positive slope, the INB $113 was positive as WTP = $0, indicating LPC was estimated to be cost-effective. Conclusions: When using ultrasound guidance for vascular access, LPCs are potentially a cost-effective strategy for reducing PIVC complications in DVA patients compared to SPCs. Given this finding, ultrasound-guided LPCs should be routinely considered as first-line among the DVA population in order to improve their overall care and wellbeing.

The performance and complications of long peripheral venous catheters: A retrospective single‐centre study

Cost effectiveness of ultrasound-guided long peripheral catheters in difficult vascular access patients

[Complications Related to Permanent Deep Venous Catheterization Using Dual Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter].

Standard Versus Long Peripheral Catheters for Multiday IV Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introducing an ultrasound-guided longer length peripheral IV catheter for patients with difficult venous access

Observational study of peripheral intravenous catheter outcomes in an internal medicine department

Peripheral intravenous catheter duration and failure in paediatric acute care: A prospective cohort study

Difficult peripheral venous access: clinical evaluation of a catheter inserted with the Seldinger method under ultrasound guidance

Complications related to short peripheral intravenous catheters in patients with acute stroke: a prospective, observational, single-cohort study

Comparison of peripheral cannula outcomes, ultrasound-guided placement of deep veins versus blind insertion of superficial veins in children aged 0–18 years: A retrospective study

From insertion to removal: A multicenter survival analysis of an admitted cohort with peripheral intravenous catheters inserted in the emergency department

Relationship between indwelling site and peripheral venous catheter-related complications in adult hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Incidence, risk factors and medical cost of peripheral intravenous catheter-related complications in hospitalised adult patients

Placement, management and complications associated with peripheral intravenous catheter use in UK small animal practice

Prospective observational study of peripheral intravenous cannula utilisation and frequency of intravenous fluid delivery in the emergency department—Convenience or necessity?

Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management

The endoscopy department can alert to complications associated with peripheral venous catheters in patients admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital

Results of a long-term, prospective study on complications of central venous catheter in pediatric patients with hematologic-oncologic diseases

A Comprehensive Intervention Program on the Long-Term Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters.

P146 PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER AND PERSISTENT LEFT SUPERIOR VENA CAVA: WHAT SHOULD WE KNOW?

Association between peripheral intravenous catheters and clinical characteristics in the development of phlebitis