Abstract:In recent years, there has been increasing interest in causal reasoning for designing fair decision-making systems due to its compatibility with legal frameworks, interpretability for human stakeholders, and robustness to spurious correlations inherent in observational data, among other factors. The recent attention to causal fairness, however, has been accompanied with great skepticism due to practical and epistemological challenges with applying current causal fairness approaches in the literature. Motivated by the long-standing empirical work on causality in econometrics, social sciences, and biomedical sciences, in this paper we lay out the conditions for appropriate application of causal fairness under the "potential outcomes framework." We highlight key aspects of causal inference that are often ignored in the causal fairness literature. In particular, we discuss the importance of specifying the nature and timing of interventions on social categories such as race or gender. Precisely, instead of postulating an intervention on immutable attributes, we propose a shift in focus to their perceptions and discuss the implications for fairness evaluation. We argue that such conceptualization of the intervention is key in evaluating the validity of causal assumptions and conducting sound causal analysis including avoiding post-treatment bias. Subsequently, we illustrate how causality can address the limitations of existing fairness metrics, including those that depend upon statistical correlations. Specifically, we introduce causal variants of common statistical notions of fairness, and we make a novel observation that under the causal framework there is no fundamental disagreement between different notions of fairness. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments where we demonstrate our approach for evaluating and mitigating unfairness, specially when post-treatment variables are present.

Analysing a built-in advantage in asymmetric darts contests using causal machine learning

Ancillary Mechanism for Autonomous Decision-Making Process in Asymmetric Confrontation: a View from Gomoku

Play Like the Pros? Solving the Game of Darts as a Dynamic Zero-Sum Game

An Empirical Bayes Approach for Estimating Skill Models for Professional Darts Players

Mind the Gap: A Causal Perspective on Bias Amplification in Prediction & Decision-Making

Maximum Expected Reward Lines If Non Specialist (for darts)

Promises and Challenges of Causality for Ethical Machine Learning

Luck, skill, and depth of competition in games and social hierarchies

Skill vs. Chance Quantification for Popular Card & Board Games

Offsetting Distortion Effects of Head Starts on Incentives in Tullock Contests

Winning Without Observing Payoffs: Exploiting Behavioral Biases to Win Nearly Every Round

On the duration and intensity of cumulative advantage competitions

Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: Lessons learned from a data analysis competition

On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisions

Decision support system for policy-making: Quantifying skill and chance in daily fantasy sports

Exploiting oddsmaker bias to improve the prediction of NFL outcomes

Demystifying the Two-Armed Futurity Bandit's Unfairness and Apparent Fairness

A generalization of the Bradley–Terry model for draws in chess with an application to collusion

Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action via Counterfactual Predictions

Tournaments, Contestant Heterogeneity and Performance