Abstract:Executive incentive has long been a hot topic among academics and practitioners. With the continuous development of China's manager market, the spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship among executives has exerted a greater influence on corporate performance. Enterprise innovation is an important part of the entrepreneurial spirit. Moreover, China's supply-side reforms and compensation system of the state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have been advanced and innovative. Therefore, based on the manager human capital theory and the organizational innovation theory, and using 15,492 firm-year observations from China's Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies for the period 2005-2018, we constructed various models, including the Gorden model, the Growth Rate of Price-Earnings Ratio model (PEG), the Ohlson and Juettner-Nauroth model (OJ), and the Capital Asset Pricing model (CAPM), to measure the cost of equity. We investigated the effect of the institutional innovation of executive incentives on the cost of equity, and the heterogeneous influence of China's special property rights system on the relationship between the two. We found that the innovations of the executive incentive system have a positive governance effect on the cost of equity. In particular, executive compensation incentives significantly reduce a company's equity costs. We also find that the state-owned property rights may weaken the positive effect of institutional innovation of executive incentives. Furthermore, China's executive incentives system and corporate governance mechanism are imperfect; and therefore, institutional innovation is a matter of great urgency and more innovative ideas for the manager market need to be introduced. China's listed companies should give full play to the spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship, constantly innovating incentive-based compensation systems of companies, and establishing a scientific and innovative concept of the cost of equity. The findings are robust after controlling for potential endogeneity concerns.

Industry tournament incentives and the speed of leverage adjustments: Evidence from China

Monetary Incentives and Innovation in Chinese SMEs

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Equity Financing Incentive and Corporate Disclosure: New Causal Evidence from SEO Deregulation

Leverage Ratio and Determinants of Capital Structure in SMEs: Evidence from China

Investment Incentives and Leverage: Evidence from China’s Accelerated Depreciation Policy

CEO industry tournament, investor attention, and company value

Managerial Cash Compensation, Government Control and Leverage Choice: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Tournament Incentives, Age Diversity and Firm Performance: Evidence from China

Tournament incentives and corporate digital transformation—evidence from China

The Real Effects of Tournament Incentives: the Case of Firm Innovation

Tournament Incentives and Audit Fees

Impact of technological innovation on corporate leverage in China: The moderating role of policy incentives and market competition

Non‐CEO executives' intraorganizational competition incentives and corporate labour investment efficiency

Incentive Pay and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China

Do Executive Equity Incentives Improve the Efficiency of Corporate Investment? ‐‐ An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Listed Companies

Impact of Tournament Incentives on Management Earnings Forecasts

Do equity incentives for the managements have impact on stock-pricing efficiency? Evidence from China

Do Tournament Incentives Matter for CEOs to Be Environmentally Responsible? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Research on the Effect of Executive Incentive Institutional Innovation on the Cost of Equity-Evidence From Chinese Listed Companies

Corporate governance,managerial incentive and firm efficiency-An empirical analysis of Chinese listed company in several industries