Public health intervention amidst conflict: Violence, politics, and knowledge frames in the 2018-20 Ebola epidemic in Democratic Republic of the Congo

Rachel Sweet,Noé Kasali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116854

IF: 5.379

2024-04-11

Social Science & Medicine

Abstract:Research, policy, and donor interest in health systems in conflict environments has grown rapidly in recent years. The 2018-20 Ebola outbreak in Democratic Republic of the Congo is a critical case in healthcare militarization. The first-ever such outbreak in an active conflict zone, it grew notorious for violence against response teams, with attacks aggravating the spread of disease. However, while medical responders observed physical attacks, the causes of the violence remained largely unknown. Drawing on interviews and participant observation , we contribute civilian vantages of the way health intervention became associated with conflict. The argument builds in two core steps. A first reconstructs civilian experiences of conflict prior to Ebola to trace how the response took on political meaning. We find that relationships associating state forces with the health response inadvertently tethered Ebola to what civilians perceived as security threats. By repeating government statements about conflict, response teams unintentionally endorsed a version of the truth that silenced local voices. A second addresses a central paradox: residents communicated these concerns directly, repeatedly, and via official channels, yet health teams failed to integrate or apply these insights. We locate this gap in the knowledge structures, or frames, accompanying intervention. Medical emergencies in warzones operates with dual sets of frames of conflict as non-state and public health resistance as ignorance. These intersect in ways that amplify invisibilities in each, clouding understandings of the nature of conflict and humanitarians' role in it. We suggest this places intervention teams at heightened risk of mis-stepping on political fault lines—and not understanding why. The study advances work on community engagement by showing that instead of simply providing scientific knowledge, effective engagement requires adjusting socio-political lenses within the response. It contributes to studies on health intervention, humanitarian emergencies, and the limits of medical neutrality.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical