Abstract:Textbook models of household behavior assume that a household is a single decision unit that allocates time and money by maximizing a common utility function with respect to a common budget constraint. But households consist of individuals with distinct preferences. Household decisions are the result of a bargaining process with usually unequal bargaining power. If this collective view of household behavior is true the traditional tools used in the measurement of inequality, poverty and welfare may produce misleading results. In this paper we test the so-called income pooling assumption which postulates that redistributing income within the household does not change individual welfare. We also provide estimates of a more general collective household model. We use subjective income evaluation as measure for individual utility. Income pooling is rejected by our results. We find evidence for an unequal distribution of the bargaining power within the household, which depends on how much each spouse contributes to household income. Consequently, there is also an unequal distribution of consumption within the household. JEL Classification : D12, C14, C23 ∗ Corresponding author: Michael Gerfin, Department of Economics, University of Bern, Schanzeneckstasse 1, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland, and IZA, Bonn, Germany; email: michael.gerfin@vwi.unibe.ch. Aline Bütikofer, Department of Economics, University of Bern, Schanzeneckstasse 1, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland; aline.buetikofer@vwi.unibe.ch. Gabrielle Wanzenried, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Institute of Financial Services Zug IFZ, Grafenauweg 10, Postfach 4332, 6304 Zug, gabrielle.wanzenried@hslu.ch. This study has been realized using the data collected in the ''Living in Switzerland'' project, conducted by the Swiss Household Panel (SHP), which is based at the Swiss Foundation for Research in the Social Sciences FORS, University of Lausanne. The project is financed by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Economic decision-making by cohabitors: findings regarding income pooling

Understanding the Marriage–Cohabitation Gap in Income Pooling: Evidence from 29 European Countries

Pooling of Wealth in Marriage: The Role of Premarital Cohabitation

Income pooling and the distribution of individual consumption among couples in Switzerland

Economic Potential and Entry into Marriage and Cohabitation

Intrahousehold allocations: a review of theories and empirical evidence

Cohabiting Couples: Rethinking Money in the Household at the Beginning of the Twenty First Century

More or Less Unmarried. The Impact of Legal Settings of Cohabitation on Labor Market Outcomes

Household Labor Supply, Child Development and Childcare Policies in the United States

Racial-Ethnic and Gender Differences in Returns to Cohabitation and Marriage: Evidence from the Current Population Survey

More or Less Unmarried. The Impact of Legal Settings of Cohabitation on Labour Market Outcomes

Cohabitation vs. Marriage: Mating Strategies by Education in The USA

Joint Utility or Sub-optimal Outcomes? Household Income Development of Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples Transitioning to Parenthood in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

Collective models and the marriage market

Investments in Marriage and Cohabitation: The Role of Legal and Interpersonal Commitment

Gender Differences in Intra-Household Efficiency: Evidence from an Investment Game Between Spouses in India

Reinterpreting the economics of extramarital affairs

Collective Intrahousehold Labor Supply in Europe: Distribution Factors and Policy Implications

Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women