A descriptive and interpretive theory of ethical responsibility in public health nursing

Anne Clancy,Julia Thuve Hovden,Hilde Laholt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241291161
IF: 3.344
2024-10-17
Nursing Ethics
Abstract:Nursing Ethics, Ahead of Print. This article presents a descriptive, interpretive theory of ethical responsibility in public health nursing. The theory is based on qualitative empirical studies, a purposeful literature review and meta-ethnography of public health nurses' experiences of ethical responsibility, interpreted within a philosophical framework. Levianasian philosophy provides the main direction for the authors' interpretations. The path for theory development consists of three phases: an inspirational phase, an explorative phase and the third phase 'joining the dots'. The theory illustrates that ethical responsibility in public health nursing is related to the life existentials of temporality and human relationships. Due to blurred boundaries in these essential life structures, public health nurses can experience a sense of satisfaction but also worries, uncertainties and loneliness. The study reveals paradoxical connections between fear and courage, and between freedom, autonomy and a sense of entrapment in responsible relationships. The authors purport that the results of this study are relevant for education and practice and can provide direction for further studies on developing theories of ethical responsibility in other nursing specialities.
nursing,ethics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?