A revised stratigraphic and tectonic framework for the Ashele volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit in the southern Chinese Altay: Evidence from stratigraphic relationships and zircon geochronology

Lei Niu,Tao Hong,Xing-Wang Xu,Hang Li,Qiang Ke,Xue-Hai Wang,Yin-Ce Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2020.103814
IF: 3.3
2020-12-01
Ore Geology Reviews
Abstract:<p>The Ashele volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit is the largest and most representative VMS deposit in the Chinese Altay Metallogenic Belt, but its stratigraphic sequence, tectonic framework, and morphology are debated. In this paper, on the basis of previous research, field investigations, excavation pits, drill-core sampling, and new LA–ICP–MS U–Pb analyses of zircons from mafic and felsic volcanic rocks, we show that the main structure of the Ashele deposit is an overturned tightly closed syncline, and that the primary orebody is controlled by this structure. Moreover, we show that the Ashele VMS deposit displays a double-layer structure made up of a feeder zone of veinlet-disseminated and stockwork orebodies overlain by massive/stratiform orebodies that are folded. We revise the stratigraphy of the Ashele Formation into five conformable sedimentary subsequences, based on new field investigations and the zircon geochronology of each subsequence. From bottom to top, we divide the formation into a siliceous tuff layer (405.1 ± 1.8 Ma), a dacitic layer (395.9–403 Ma), a rhyolitic layer (390.9 ± 0.38 Ma), an orebody layer (ca. 387 Ma), and a basalt layer (387–377 Ma). The Early to Middle Devonian Ashele Formation unconformably underlies the Late Devonian Qiye Formation.</p>
mineralogy,geology,mining & mineral processing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main issue that this paper attempts to address is the controversy surrounding the stratigraphic sequence, structural framework, and morphology of the main ore body of the Ashele volcanic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit. Specifically: 1. **Stratigraphic Sequence**: There are different interpretations of the stratigraphic sequence of the Ashele deposit, including whether it is an inverted syncline structure or a monocline structure. The paper redefines the stratigraphic sequence of the Ashele Formation through new field surveys, drilling sampling, and zircon U-Pb geochronology analysis. 2. **Structural Framework**: The structural framework of the deposit is also controversial, especially the morphology of the main ore body (Ore Body 1). Through detailed geological surveys and structural analysis, the paper confirms that the main structure of the deposit is an inverted tight syncline, and the main ore body is controlled by this structure. 3. **Ore Body Morphology**: The morphology of Ore Body 1 has been described by different researchers as "hook-shaped," "Y-shaped," or tabular. Through detailed geological profile measurements and borehole observations, the paper determines that the morphology of the ore body is a tight syncline, with the ore body exhibiting massive ore, banded ore, veinlet ore, and disseminated ore in the upper and lower parts of the syncline, respectively. 4. **Double-layer Structure**: The paper also confirms that the Ashele VMS deposit has a double-layer structure, with the upper part being massive/layered ore bodies and the lower part being veinlet-disseminated and stockwork ore bodies, the latter possibly being the supply zone of mineralizing fluids. Through these studies, the paper provides important geological evidence for further exploration of the Ashele deposit.