Abstract:Objective: Because there is no reliable method on admission to predict whether a patient will require neurosurgical intervention in the future, the general approach remains to treat each patient with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and subdural hematoma (SDH) as if they will require such an intervention. Consequently, there is a growing population of patients with mTBI and SDH that is overtriaged despite having a low probability of needing neurosurgical intervention. This study aimed to train and validate a predictive rule-out tool for neurosurgical intervention in patients with mTBI and SDH. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients admitted to six level I trauma centers in three states. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: admitted between 2016 and 2020, ≥ 18 years of age, ICD-10 diagnosis of isolated SDH, initial head imaging available, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15, and arrived within 48 hours of injury. Exclusion criteria included skull fracture, intracranial hemorrhage other than an SDH, and no neurosurgical consultation. Prediction variables included 34 demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables. The study outcome was neurosurgical intervention within 48 hours of hospital admission. Seventy-five percent of the data were used for training, and 25% for testing. Multivariable logistic regression with fivefold cross-validation was used on the training set to identify covariates with the highest specificity while holding sensitivity at 100%. Results were validated on the testing set. Results: In total, 1000 patients were in the training set and 333 in the testing set. The overall neurosurgical intervention rate was 8.8%. For the fivefold cross-validation process, three variables were selected that maximized specificity while holding sensitivity at 100%: maximum hematoma thickness, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, and preinjury antithrombotic use (sensitivity 100%, specificity 56%, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.94). With a cutoff probability of neurosurgical intervention set at 1.88%, the final model was validated to predict neurosurgical intervention with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 88.4%-100%) and specificity of 55.1% (95% CI 49.3%-60.8%). Conclusions: In this study, the largest of its kind to date, the authors successfully developed and validated a new tool for ruling out the necessity of neurosurgical intervention in patients with mTBI and isolated SDH. By successfully identifying more than half of patients who are unlikely to require neurosurgery within the first 2 days of admission, this tool can be used to improve treatment efficiency and provide patients and clinicians with valuable prognostic information.

The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) and emergency department observation and admission rates: A retrospective cohort study

External evaluation of Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) low risk criteria for traumatic brain injury

Retrospective Validation of Brain Injury Guidelines in a Rural Level II Trauma Center

Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Managed in a Non-Intensive Care Unit Setting

Modified Brain Injury Guidelines for preinjury anticoagulation in traumatic brain injury: An opportunity to reduce health care resource utilization

Diagnostic utility of Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG): systematic review and meta-analysis for prediction of neurosurgical intervention in traumatic brain injury

Comparing Blood Biomarkers to Clinical Decision Rules to Select Patients Suspected of Traumatic Brain Injury for Head Computed Tomography.

A pediatric Brain Injury Guideline allows safe management of traumatic brain injuries by trauma surgeons

Less is more: Streamlining management of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage in the modified brain injury guidelines

Creating and validating a neurosurgical intervention rule-out tool for patients with mild traumatic brain injury and isolated subdural hematoma: a 5-year, six-center retrospective cohort study

Application of Brain Injury Guidelines at a Pediatric Level 1 Trauma Center predicts reliability, safety, and improved resource utilization

Reducing Low-Value Interhospital Transfers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Outcomes of traumatic brain injury patients in an adult intensive care unit of a South African regional hospital, without on-site neurosurgical service: A retrospective quantitative study on the neurological improvement at discharge

The Risk of Deterioration in GCS13–15 Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Identified by Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patient Outcomes in Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Analysis

Chinese Admission Warning Strategy for Predicting the Hospital Discharge Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Outcomes of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Transferred to Trauma Centers

Identification and management of low-risk isolated traumatic brain injury patients initially treated at a rural level IV trauma center

Prospective Outpatient Follow-Up of Early Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Intracranial Hemorrhage

Association of pre-admission opioid abuse and/or dependence on major complications in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients

Early Beta-Blocker Utilization in Critically Ill Patients With Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study