Abstract:Importance: Stroke center certification is granted to facilities that demonstrate distinct capabilities for treating patients with stroke. A thorough understanding of structural discrimination in the provision of stroke centers is critical for identifying and implementing effective interventions to improve health inequities for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Objective: To determine whether (1) hospitals in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities (defined using the Area Deprivation Index) are less likely to adopt any stroke certification and (2) adoption rates differ between entry-level (acute stroke-ready hospitals) and higher-level certifications (primary, thrombectomy capable, and comprehensive) by community disadvantage status. Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used newly collected stroke center data merged with data from the American Hospital Association, Healthcare Cost Report Information datasets, and the US Census. All general acute hospitals in the continental US between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2022, were included. Data analysis was conducted from July 2023 to May 2024. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the likelihood of hospitals adopting stroke care certification. Cox proportional hazard and competing risk models were used to estimate the likelihood of a hospital becoming stroke certified based on the socioeconomic disadvantage status of the community. Results: Among the 5055 hospitals studied from 2009 to 2022, 2415 (47.8%) never achieved stroke certification, 602 (11.9%) were certified as acute stroke-ready hospitals, and 2038 (40.3%) were certified as primary stroke centers or higher. When compared with mixed-advantage communities, adoption of any stroke certification was most likely to occur near the most advantaged communities (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07-1.44) and least likely near the most disadvantaged communities (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34-0.55). Adoption of acute stroke-ready certification was most likely in mixed-advantage communities, while adoption of higher-level certification was more likely in the most advantaged communities (HR,1.41; 95% CI, 1.22-1.62) and less likely for the most disadvantaged communities (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21-0.45). After adjusting for population size and hospital capacity, compared with mixed-advantage communities, stroke certification adoption hazard was still 20% lower for relatively disadvantaged communities (adjusted HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87) and 42% lower for the most disadvantaged communities (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.74). Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study examining hospital adoption of stroke services, when compared with mixed-advantage communities, hospitals located in the most disadvantaged communities had a 42% lower hazard of adopting any stroke certification and relatively disadvantaged communities had a 20% lower hazard of adopting any stroke certification. These findings suggest that there is a need to support hospitals in disadvantaged communities to obtain stroke certification as a way to reduce stroke disparities.

Abstract WP112: Neighborhood Level Characteristics Associated With Adequate Transition of Stroke Care: The Transition of Care Stroke Disparities Study

Abstract TMP32: Race and Ethnic Differences in Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery Post-Stroke Within the Florida Stroke Registry - Transitions of Care

Abstract TMP21: Hospital Characteristics Influencing Discharge Disposition Following Acute Stroke: Findings From the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke Registry

Abstract NS6: Connecting the Dots; a Pharmacist-Led Care Transition Model for Stroke Patients Post-Discharge

Abstract WMP106: The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Ambulatory Status at Discharge Following Acute Ischemic Stroke: Findings From the Get With the Guidelines-Stroke Registry

Abstract TMP40: The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Stroke Readmissions and Recovery

Abstract WMP99: A Novel Network Analysis of County- and Individual-Level Factors Associated With Functional Outcomes After Stroke

Abstract HUP16: Disparities In Stroke Care In The Metro Detroit Area

Abstract WMP51: Patient-Related Factors and Social Determinants of Health Associated With Discharge to Home Following Acute Ischemic Stroke: Findings From the Get With the Guidelines Stroke Registry

Socioeconomic status and care after stroke: results from the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network.

The association between social networks and functional recovery after stroke

Abstract TP85: Neighborhood Built Environment May Not Influence Reintegration to Normal Living Post-Stroke

Abstract TP101: Disposition Disparities: Differences in Discharge and Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Between Racial and Ethnic Groups

Socioeconomic Status and Care after Stroke

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and 30-Day Outcomes for Common Cardiovascular Conditions

Provision of Stroke Care Services by Community Disadvantage Status in the US, 2009-2022

Association of Neighborhood-Level Marginalization With Health Care Use and Clinical Outcomes Following Hospital Discharge in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Catheterization for Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Single-Payer Health Care System

Abstract HUP5: Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Disparities in Acute Stroke Treatment in Community and Academic Hospitals

Abstract P69: Clinical and Demographic Characteristics Associated With Cognitive Recovery During Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation

Abstract 146: Racial Disparities In The Treatment Of Post-stroke Complications Among Acute Stroke Patients

Abstract NS9: Nurse-Led Quality Improvement Initiative: Advancing Stroke Awareness in Communities Experiencing Racial and Ethnic Disparities