Abstract:Improved crop genotypes are constantly introduced However, information on their nutritional quality is generally limited. The present study reports the proximate composition and the concentration and relative bioavailability of minerals of improved finger millets of different genotypes. Grains of finger millet genotypes (n = 15) grown in research station during 2019 and 2020 in Ethiopia, and replicated three times in a randomized complete block design, were analysed for proximate composition, mineral concentration (iron, zinc, calcium, selenium), and antinutritional factors (phytate, tannin and oxalate). Moreover, the antinutritional factors to mineral molar ratio method was used to estimate mineral bioavailability. The result shows a significant genotypic variation in protein, fat and fibre level, ranging from 10% to 14.6%, 1.0 to 3.8%, and 1.4 to 4.6%, respectively. Similarly, different finger millets genotypes had significantly different mineral concentrations ranging from 3762 ± 332 to 5893 ± 353 mg kg −1 for Ca, 19.9 ± 1.6 to 26.2 ± 2.7 mg kg −1 for Zn, 36.3 ± 4.6 to 52.9 ± 9.1 mg kg −1 for Fe and 36.6 ± 11 to 60.9 ± 22 μg kg −1 for Se. Phytate (308–360 μg g −1 ), tannin (0.15–0.51 mg g −1 ) and oxalate (1.26–4.41 mg g −1 ) concentrations were also influenced by genotype. Antinutritional factors to minerals molar ratio were also significantly different by genotypes but were below the threshold for low mineral bioavailability. Genotype significantly influenced mineral and antinutritional concentrations of finger millet grains. In addition, all finger millet genotypes possess good mineral bioavailability. Especially, the high Ca concentration in finger millet, compared to in other cereals, could play a vital role to combating Ca deficiency. The result suggests the different finger millet genotypes possess good nutrient content and may contribute to the nutrition security of the local people.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the nutritional value of different genotypes of Finger Millet (*Eleusine coracana* L.), especially its mineral concentration and relative bioavailability. Specifically, the research focuses on the following points: 1. **Nutrient composition analysis**: Evaluate the approximate composition of different genotypes of Finger Millet, including the content of major nutrients such as protein, fat, and fiber. 2. **Mineral concentration**: Measure the concentrations of minerals such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), and selenium (Se) in different genotypes of Finger Millet. 3. **Anti - nutritional factor analysis**: Determine the concentrations of anti - nutritional factors such as Phytate, Tannin, and Oxalate in different genotypes of Finger Millet. 4. **Mineral bioavailability**: Evaluate the bioavailability of these minerals by calculating the molar ratios of anti - nutritional factors to minerals (such as the molar ratios of phytate to iron, zinc, and calcium, and the molar ratio of oxalate to calcium). ### Research background Finger Millet is an important food crop, especially in the semi - arid regions of East Africa, and is crucial for millions of resource - poor small - holder families. Although breeding programs usually focus on agronomic traits (such as yield, drought tolerance, and disease resistance), the information on its nutritional value is relatively limited. Therefore, this study aims to fill this gap, provide a scientific basis for future breeding programs, and promote the consumption of Finger Millet and agricultural interventions in the local area. ### Main findings - **Differences in nutrient composition**: There are significant differences in the protein, fat, and fiber contents of different genotypes of Finger Millet, which are respectively between 10% and 14.6%, 1.0% and 3.8%, and 1.4% and 4.6%. - **Differences in mineral concentration**: There are also significant differences in the concentrations of calcium, zinc, iron, and selenium in different genotypes of Finger Millet, which are respectively between 3762 ± 332 and 5893 ± 353 mg/kg, 19.9 ± 1.6 and 26.2 ± 2.7 mg/kg, 36.3 ± 4.6 and 52.9 ± 9.1 mg/kg, and 36.6 ± 11 and 60.9 ± 22 µg/kg. - **Differences in anti - nutritional factors**: There are also significant differences in the concentrations of phytate (308 - 360 µg/g), tannin (0.15 - 0.51 mg/g), and oxalate (1.26 - 4.41 mg/g) in different genotypes of Finger Millet. - **Mineral bioavailability**: All genotypes of Finger Millet show good mineral bioavailability, especially the high calcium concentration, which may help combat calcium deficiency. ### Conclusion This study shows that there are significant differences in the approximate composition, mineral and anti - nutritional factor contents, and mineral bioavailability among different genotypes of Finger Millet. Overall, Finger Millet is a good source of calcium and protein, and also a reasonable source of iron and zinc. In particular, the Bereda and BKFM0010 genotypes have the highest mineral concentrations, while the Paddet genotype has the highest protein content, and these genotypes can be the focus of future breeding programs. In addition, the high concentration of calcium in Finger Millet and its good bioavailability may play an important role in preventing diseases such as gestational hypertension. Although Finger Millet has high nutritional value, its utilization rate in the daily diet is low, so community nutrition education is needed to promote the nutritional value of Finger Millet and product development.

Differences in the nutritional quality of improved finger millet genotypes in Ethiopia

Characterization of Finger Millet Global Germplasm Diversity Panel for Grain Nutrients Content for Utilization in Biofortification Breeding

Nutritional and phytochemical profiling of nutracereal finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) genotypes

Genetic variability of panicle architecture and nutritional parameters in indigenous finger millet genotypes from Koraput, Eastern Ghats of India

A Review on Nutritional Properties and Health Benefits of Finger Millet

An Omics Study of Iron and Zinc Homeostasis in Finger Millet: Biofortified Foods for Micronutrient Deficiency in an Era of Climate Change?

Effect of soaking conditions on chemical composition, antioxidant activity, total phenols, flavonoids and anti-nutritional contents of finger millet

The nutritional use of millet grain for food and feed: a review

Finger millet (Eleusine coracana) enhancement through genomic resources and breeding methods: current implications and potential future interventions

Phenomics and genomics of finger millet: current status and future prospects

Uncovering the genomic regions underlying grain iron and zinc content using genome-wide association mapping in finger millet

Malting process optimization for protein digestibility enhancement in finger millet grain

Chemical composition and in vitro iron bioavailability of extruded and open-pan cooked germinated and ungerminated pearl whole millet "Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br."

Effect of Germination on Anti-oxidant Activity, Total Phenols, Flavonoids and Anti-nutritional Content of Finger Millet Flour

The nutritional quality of cereals varies geospatially in Ethiopia and Malawi

Nutritional Values and Potential Health Benefits of Millets- A Review

Millet grains: Nutritional quality, processing, and potential health benefits

Proximate, mineral, and anti-nutrient compositions of underutilized plants of Ethiopia: Figl (Raphanus sativus L.), Girgir (Eruca sativa L) and Karkade (Hibiscus sabdariffa): Implications for in-vitro mineral bioavailability

Biofortified foxtail millet: towards a more nourishing future

Effect of Ecological Factors on Nutritional Quality of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica L.)

Can site-specific nutrient management improve the productivity and resource use efficiency of climate-resilient finger millet in calcareous soils in India?