Investigating sources of non-response bias in a population-based seroprevalence study of vaccine-preventable diseases in the Netherlands

Abigail Postema,José A. Ferreira,Fiona van der Klis,Hester de Melker,Liesbeth Mollema
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09095-5
IF: 3.7
2024-02-25
BMC Infectious Diseases
Abstract:PIENTER 3 (P3), conducted in 2016/17, is the most recent of three nationwide serological surveys in the Netherlands. The surveys aim to monitor the effects of the National Immunisation Programme (NIP) by assessing population seroprevalence of included vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs). The response rate to the main sample was 15.7% ( n = 4,983), following a decreasing trend in response compared to the previous two PIENTER studies (P1, 55.0%; 1995/1996 [ n = 8,356] and P2, 33.0%; 2006/2007 [ n = 5,834]). Non-responders to the main P3 survey were followed-up to complete a "non-response" questionnaire, an abridged 9-question version of the main survey covering demographics, health, and vaccination status. We assess P3 representativeness and potential sources of non-response bias, and trends in decreasing participation rates across all PIENTER studies.
infectious diseases
What problem does this paper attempt to address?