Abstract:Although living and nonliving stimuli are known to rely on distinct brain regions during perception, it is largely unknown if their episodic memory encoding mechanisms differ as well. To investigate this issue, we asked participants to encode object pictures (e.g., a picture of a tiger) and to retrieve them later in response to their names (e.g., word "tiger"). For each of four semantic classes (living-animate, living-inanimate, nonliving-large, and nonliving-small), we examined differences in the similarity in activation patterns (neural pattern similarity [NPS]) for subsequently remembered versus forgotten items. Higher NPS for remembered items suggests an advantage of within-class item similarity, whereas lower NPS for remembered items indicates an advantage for item distinctiveness. We expect NPS within class-specific regions to be higher for remembered than for forgotten items. For example, the parahippocampal cortex has a well-known role in scene processing [Aminoff, E. M., Kveraga, K., & Bar, M. The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 379-390, 2013], and the anterior temporal and inferior frontal gyrus have well-known roles in object processing [Clarke, A., & Tyler, L. K. Object-specific semantic coding in human perirhinal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 4766-4775, 2014]. As such, we expect to see higher NPS for remembered items in these regions pertaining to scenes and objects, respectively. Consistent with this hypothesis, in fusiform, parahippocampal, and retrosplenial regions, higher NPS predicted memory for subclasses of nonliving objects, whereas in the left inferior frontal and left retrosplenial regions, lower NPS predicted memory for subclasses of living objects. Taken together, the results support the idea that subsequent memory depends on a balance of similarity and distinctiveness and demonstrate that the neural mechanisms of episodic encoding differ across semantic categories.

When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval?

Semantic relatedness proactively benefits learning, memory, and interdependence across episodes

Adult age differences in the use of temporal and semantic context in dual-list free recall.

Effects of semantic list structure differences in free recall

Memory for Related and Unrelated Words: Further Evidence on the Influence of Semantic Factors in Immediate Serial Recall

Semantic feature effect in verbal short-term memory

Contingency of semantic generalization on episodic specificity varies across development

Going beyond a single list: Modeling the effects of prior experience on episodic free recall

Semantic associations restore neural encoding mechanisms

Subsequent Memory Effects in Cortical Pattern Similarity Differ by Semantic Class

Recall of semantic domains

Episodic and Semantic Memory Contribute to Familiar and Novel Episodic Future Thinking.

The Effect Of Semantic Relatedness On Immediate Serial Recall And Serial Recognition

Context and semantic object properties interact to support recognition memory

The Nature and Neural Correlates of Semantic Association versus Conceptual Similarity

Separable Prefrontal Cortex Contributions to Free Recall

Sleep reduces the semantic coherence of memory recall: An application of latent semantic analysis to investigate memory reconstruction

Semantic interference deficits and the detection of mild Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment without dementia

Hierarchical searching in episodic memory

Semantic Clustering during Verbal Episodic Memory Encoding and Retrieval in Older Adults: One Cognitive Mechanism of Superaging

Attention focused on memory: The episodic flanker effect with letters, words, colors, and pictures