Abstract:Introduction: Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) is a recently developed technique for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. The present study compares the outcomes of RAMIE and video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE). Method: Patients undergoing minimally invasive esophageal surgery between December 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study, while those undergoing conventional surgery were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups, as those undergoing RAMIE (Group 1) and those undergoing VATE (Group 2). The demographic and clinical characteristics, intraoperative parameters, pathological data, and postoperative parameters of the groups were compared. Results: A total of 28 patients were included in the study, with 13 patients in Group 1 and 15 patients in Group 2. The gender distribution was similar (P = 0.488), and the mean age was 64.7 and 59.0 years in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.068). The majority of the sample was in the ASA2 category (46.2% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.341); Ca19.9 levels were higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (25.7 vs. 13.7, P = 0.027); preoperative Hb was lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.9 g/dL vs. 12.2 g/dL, P = 0.043); the most commonly performed surgery was the McKeown procedure (69.2% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.492); an intraoperative feeding jejunostomy was placed only in Group 2; the operation time was similar between the groups (338.5 min vs. 340 min, P = 0.916); and the distribution of tumor localizations was similar between the groups (P = 0.407). In terms of tumor histology, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most common tumor type in the two groups (84.6% vs. 80%, P = 0.636); the tumor diameter was similar between the groups (14.9 vs. 18.1, P = 0.652); the number of removed lymph nodes was similar between the groups (24.9 vs. 22.5, P = 0.419); and the number of metastatic lymph nodes was higher in Group 2 (0.08 vs. 1.07, P = 0.27). One patient in Group 2 underwent repeat surgery due to suspected ischemic anastomosis; the distribution of postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system was similar in the two groups (P = 0.650); there was no early mortality within the first 30 days in either group; one patient in Group 2 was re-admitted within 90 days of discharge with decreased oral intake; the length of hospital stay was shorter in Group 1 (9 days vs. 16.5 days, P = 0.006); and the patients in Group 2 more often received neoadjuvant therapy in proportion to the disease stage (15.4% vs. 60%, P = 0.016). Conclusion: Robotic procedures can be safely performed in esophageal cancers with complication rates and oncological radicality similar to those of other minimally invasive techniques.

Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy

Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?

405. SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED ESOPHAGECTOMY

[Robot-assisted esophageal surgery]

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the left lateral decubitus position

Technical Details of the Abdominal Part During Full Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Automated Surgical-Phase Recognition for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using Artificial Intelligence

ASO Visual Abstract: the Current State of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (ramie)—outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) Esophageal Registry

Efficacy and Perioperative Safety of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Perioperative and mid-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched analysis of 842 patients

The Current State of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE): Outcomes from the Upper GI International Robotic Association (UGIRA) Esophageal Registry

A comparative review of minimally invasive approaches to esophagectomy: technical considerations, variations, and outcomes

Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy

Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study

Robot-Assisted-Minimally Invasive-Transhiatal Esophagectomy (RAMI-THE)

Short-term and long-term results of robot-assisted esophagectomy in cT3br/T4b esophageal cancer at initial diagnosis: Comparison with conventional thoracoscopic surgery.

Attaining Proficiency in Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy While Maximizing Safety during Procedure Development

Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center

Procedures and Research Status of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy