Abstract:BACKGROUND: This article aims to provide an up-to-date resource on disaster management by reporting about the destructive fea-tures of the earthquake that occurred on October 30, 2020, and about the hospital and emergency service organization during a pandemic.METHODS: This study was carried out with a multicentered, cross-sectional retrospective design on the victims of the 2020 Aegean Sea - Izmir earthquake. Local ethics committee approval was obtained. The data obtained by obtaining permission from two hospitals and ambulance services (transport data) located in the region where earthquake-related destruction was most prominent were evalu-ated. Patient data including demographic data, time of arrival to the emergency department, duration of stay under the debris, triage codes (green: not urgent, slightly injured; yellow: may be delayed, injured; red: critically injured; and black: dead), type of injuries, dura-tion of stay in the emergency department, crush syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, need for invasive procedures (e.g., surgery and dialysis), intensive care admission, hospital admission, and discharge were evaluated.RESULTS: In total, 313 patients (60.4% females) were included in the study according to the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the participants was 38.0±21.0 years, with the youngest being a 6-month-old baby and the oldest a 91-year-old individual. Approximately 41.5% of the earthquake victims presented to the emergency department within the first 3 h of the earthquake, and patients with yellow triage code were the most common in the 1st h. Further, 35.2% of the patients who were rescued from under the debris were discharged alive. Four patients were discharged alive after being rescued from under the debris 24 h following the earthquake, of whom three were rescued after >48 h (longest duration, 91 h). Further, 32 (15.9%) patients who survived upon presentation to the emergency department had rhabdomyolysis, 4 (1.9%) underwent hemodialysis in the emergency department due to acute renal failure, and 8 (3.8%) underwent other emergency operations such as fasciotomy and amputation. In total, 122 patients died and 191 patients were discharged from the hospitals. Furthermore, 139 patients were discharged from the emergency department, 15 were admitted to the intensive care unit, 41 were hospitalized in the relevant clinics, and 112 were directly transferred to the morgue following preliminary evaluation.CONCLUSION: Emergency services should be ready in terms of accurate registration, correct data entry, correct triage assignment, sufficient resources, adequate team, sufficient equipment, and adequate treatment areas for disasters such as earthquakes. Further, ade-quate disaster trainings should be provided, feasible disaster relief plans should be prepared, and regular exercises should be conducted.

The role of emergency medicine specialists and general practitioners in yellow zone patient management: A case in the Sakarya Province

Acil servis tanıları ile paramediklerin ilk değerlendirme tanılarının karşılaştırılması

Assessment of Hospital Medical Emergency Team Operations in a Tertiary Care Center in Turkey

Emergency medical service use at a pediatric center in Turkey, during the COVID-19 pandemic period

The Effect of Complaint-based Patient Education on Inappropriate Use of the Emergency Department: Experiences of an Academic Centre in Turkey and Literature Review

Pulmonary Physician Consultancy in Emergency Services in Turkiye (PuPCEST) – a cross-sectional multicenter study

Why patients self-refer to the emergency service for nonurgency?: A mix-method survey from a family medicine perspective

Three-year retrospective analysis of code blue calls: single center experience

Evaluation of Emergency Admissions Due to Animal-Related Incidents Based on Prehospital Emergency Medicine Data: A Retrospective Study

Emergency Department Management After the 2020 Aegean Sea - Izmir Earthquake

Suitability of emergency department attenders to be assessed in primary care: survey of general practitioner agreement in a random sample of triage records analysed in a service evaluation project

A Cross-Sectional Study of Emergency Care Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multicenter Study of Healthcare Staff Perspectives

Characteristics of patients leaving the emergency department without being seen by a doctor: The first report from Türkiye

Data analysis of patients admitted to the emergency medicine clinic of Mersin City Training and Research Hospital after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake

Beyond Injuries: February 6th Kahramanmaras Earthquakes and Other Patients Transported by Ambulance

Examination of the transport characteristics of pediatric trauma patients

Practice as you Teach: Comparing Ordering Practices Between Shared and Physician-Only Visits in Academically Affiliated Community Emergency Departments

Medical expertise as a critical influencing factor on the length of stay in the ED: A retrospective cohort study

Predictability of adult patient medical emergency condition from triage vital signs and comorbidities: a single-center, observational study

TRIAGE IN THE WORLD AND IN TURKEY AND THE TRIAGE KNOWLEDGE LEVELS OF EMERGENCY WARD NURSES

Comprehensive assessment of emergency departments in county-level public hospitals: a multicenter descriptive cross-sectional study in Henan province, China