Comparison of environmental impacts of fly ash and slag as cement replacement materials for mass concrete and the impact of transportation

Christian Orozco,Sandhya Babel,Somnuk Tangtermsirikul,Takafumi Sugiyama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00796
IF: 10.681
2024-04-01
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Abstract:For mass concrete applications, the utilization of waste as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM), such as fly ash and slag, can enhance sustainability. This study aims to provide and compare the environmental impacts associated with utilizing fly ash and slag, considering their modes of transportation. Both land and maritime sea transportation are investigated. The environmental impacts of mass concrete mixtures with 65% ground-granulated blast furnace slag (65GGBS) and 50% fly ash (50FA) as cement replacement were investigated using cradle-to-gate life cycle analysis in Thailand context. Results show that fly ash (164 kg CO2 eq, 54% reduction) and GGBS (141 kg CO2 eq, 61% reduction) reduce the global warming potential of pure-cement concrete (357 kg CO2 eq) without considering SCM transportation. However, the processing of GGBS increases marine eutrophication and human carcinogenic toxicity by 4.59 and 3.89 times, respectively, compared to the cement-only mixture. Due to maritime shipping, the environmental performance of 65GGBS concrete exceeds that of pure cement mixtures in 15 impact indicators. The largest proportion of terrestrial acidification (92%), ozone formation (90%), and fine particulate matter (88%) is attributable to long distance maritime transportation. All the environmental impacts from 50FA are lower than those associated with pure-cement concrete at a land transportation distance of 190 km. Regarding endpoint impacts, 65GGBS is better than 50FA in reducing harm to human health and the ecosystem. This study's findings emphasize the importance of considering SCM type, transportation logistics, and their intricate interplay, providing valuable insights for sustainable concrete production.
energy & fuels,materials science, multidisciplinary,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?