Abstract:Background:: Medical devices are the machine, tool, instrument, apparatus, implant, calibrator in vitro, software, the similar or related object intended for use by the manufacturer alone or in combination becoming increasingly important in the healthcare sector as these are used to diagnosis, control, prevention or treatment of an illness. Safety of the world population is the highest priority in order to launch new medical devices for the treatment and diagnostic of several diseases. New innovation in industries and regulations work together to provide devices for different world market and to improve quality and safety of exiting devices in the market. The main key for devices is to classify the determination of actual regulatory pathway which ensures the safety standards and other regulatory requirements in a specific country. We perform clinical trials for medical device which are quite different from the clinical trials performed for drug analysis. For any high-risk devices, the new EU law states that the manufacturer has to prepare a complete summary for their evidence. The clinical trials regulation provides more transparency on clinical trials data. Complete transparency is required for the maximum possibility of informed decisions in order to use new medical devices. Objective:: The current manuscript will provide the information regarding the regulatory framework for the approval of medical devices and clinical investigation of medical device in European Union and comparison of approval process of medical device in USA, EU and India. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the most suitable and emerging requirements that manufacturers need for introducing their medical devices in the market in compliance with the MDR regulations. Conclusion:: The proposal for a modified regulation of medical devices aims to ensure more robust clinical data in support of the CE marking applications of the medical device. The clinical investigation requirements will be mandatory, and there will be an obligation to demonstrate the clinical benefits of the device and provide a rigorous equivalence test if the assessment is based on comparison devices. The new European legislation should require the premarket demonstration of clinical efficacy and safety, using a randomized controlled trial if possible, and a transparent clinical review, preferably centralized.

Regulatory perspectives on post-market evidence generation schemes for high-risk medical devices: a systematic review

Lifecycle evidence requirements for high-risk implantable medical devices: a European perspective

A review of the literature on the new European Medical Device Regulations requirements for increased clinical evaluation

PRE-MARKET CLINICAL EVALUATIONS OF INNOVATIVE HIGH-RISK MEDICAL DEVICES IN EUROPE

Regulation and Clinical Investigation of Medical Device in the European Union

The need for transparency of clinical evidence for medical devices in Europe

Improving Medical Device Regulation: The United States and Europe in Perspective

Improved clinical investigation and evaluation of high-risk medical devices: the rationale and objectives of CORE–MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for Medical Devices)

Quality and Utility of European Cardiovascular and Orthopaedic Registries for the Regulatory Evaluation of Medical Device Safety and Performance Across the Implant Lifecycle: A Systematic Review

Challenges faced by manufacturers with clinical evaluation under the new European Medical Device Regulations

An accelerated access pathway for innovative high-risk medical devices under the new European Union Medical Devices and health technology assessment regulations? Analysis and recommendations

The Challenges for Manufacturers of the Increased Clinical Evaluation in the European Medical Device Regulations: A Quantitative Study

A new platform for post-marketing surveillance and real-world evidence data collection for substance-based medical devices

Use of Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Approval and Coverage of Medical Devices: A Landscape Assessment

Regulatory Framework for Implantable Neurostimulation Devices: Comparison of Systems in the US and European Union

New medical device regulations: the regulator’s view

Research methodology and practical issues relating to the conduct of a medical device registry

Regulation of orthopaedic devices: Future implications for research and innovation

Post-market clinical research conducted by medical device manufacturers: a cross-sectional survey

Neither protective nor harmonized: the crossborder regulation of medical devices in the EU

Evaluating the Safety Profile of Non-Active Implantable Medical Devices Compared with Medicines