Abstract:A hydrokinetic turbine with a vertical axis is specifically designed to harvest the kinetic energy from moving water. In this study, three vertical axis water turbines, namely Gorlov, Darrieus, and Savonius turbines, were compared for their efficiency via numerical modeling for steady-state conditions via the ANSYS 2022 R2 Fluent model. The Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations (SIMPLE) was implemented with an SST k-ω turbulence model. The dynamic mesh technique, which allows modeling according to changes in angular velocity at each time step, was used to simulate flow around the turbines for six different velocities (from 0.5 to 3 m/s). The efficiency of the turbines was compared and the results were analyzed. The pressure, velocity, and turbulence kinetic energy distributions around the rotor were measured at different rotational angles and results indicated a wider operating range for the Darrieus and Gorlov turbines compared to the Savonius turbine. The highest power coefficient of 0.293 was achieved in the model featuring a Darrieus turbine, corresponding to a TSR value of 1.34, compared to 0.208 for the Gorlov and 0.257 for the Savonius turbine, at TSR values of 1.3 and 1.06, respectively. Numerical modeling results pointed to a significantly higher self-starting capacity for the Savonius turbine compared to the others.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of improving the efficiency of water energy utilization by analyzing the design of three types of vertical axis water turbines (Gorlov, Darrieus, and Savonius) through numerical simulation. Specifically, the researchers aim to identify the most effective design by comparing the performance of these three turbines under different flow conditions, thereby optimizing the efficiency of hydropower systems.
### Background and Issues
1. **Energy Demand**: The development of the global economy and the improvement of living standards require sufficient energy supply. Electricity is an indispensable part of modern society, widely used in various daily activities.
2. **Importance of Renewable Energy**: Renewable energy includes wind, solar, and water energy, which can be naturally replenished on a human timescale. Water energy, as a sustainable energy source, generates electricity by altering the natural flow of rivers or water bodies.
3. **Limitations of Traditional Hydropower**: Although large hydropower stations generate significant amounts of electricity, they pose environmental issues. For example, the construction of dams and reservoirs can restrict the movement of fish and other aquatic organisms, alter climate, flow characteristics, temperature, biodiversity, chemical composition, and sediment load, affecting the ecology upstream and downstream of rivers and the formation of estuaries.
4. **Advantages of Small Hydropower**: Small hydropower stations are cost-effective and have minimal environmental impact, making them suitable for rural electrification projects. However, traditional micro-hydropower stations usually require water diversion from rivers and have limited water storage capacity.
5. **Potential of Hydrokinetic Technology**: Hydrokinetic technology generates electricity by capturing the kinetic energy of flowing water, without the need for dams or other expensive infrastructure. This technology is suitable for isolated settlements and farms in low-altitude areas, offering high-density energy production, reliable predictability, and low environmental impact.
### Research Objectives
1. **Compare the Performance of Three Turbines**: Use numerical simulation to compare the efficiency of Gorlov, Darrieus, and Savonius vertical axis water turbines under different flow conditions.
2. **Optimize Turbine Design**: Identify the best-performing turbine design under various conditions to improve the overall efficiency of hydrokinetic technology.
3. **Evaluate Self-Starting Capability**: Investigate the self-starting capability of different types of turbines under various flow conditions, which is crucial for the startup and operation in practical applications.
### Methods
1. **Numerical Simulation**: Use the ANSYS 2022 R2 Fluent model for numerical simulation under steady-state conditions, employing the Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations (SIMPLE) method and the SST k-ω turbulence model.
2. **Dynamic Mesh Technology**: Use dynamic mesh technology to simulate the flow around the turbines, allowing modeling based on the angular velocity changes at each time step.
3. **Performance Parameters**: Calculate the distribution of pressure, velocity, and turbulent kinetic energy, and measure these parameters at different rotational angles to evaluate the efficiency of the turbines.
### Results
1. **Efficiency Comparison**: The highest power coefficient of the Darrieus turbine is 0.293, corresponding to a tip speed ratio (TSR) value of 1.34; the highest power coefficient of the Gorlov turbine is 0.208, with a TSR value of 1.3; the highest power coefficient of the Savonius turbine is 0.257, with a TSR value of 1.06.
2. **Self-Starting Capability**: The self-starting capability of the Savonius turbine is significantly higher than that of the other two turbines.
Through this research, the authors hope to provide valuable references for the development of hydrokinetic technology, promoting its further optimization in practical applications.