A cross‐sectional study of anesthesia medical staff's occupational and health status in nongovernment medical institutions in China

Bo Wang,Kunpeng Liu,Hui Shi,Xuanling Chen,Xuewei Qin,Lan Yao,Yongxing Sun,Wei Chai,Chunhong Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.14194
2024-11-10
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Abstract:Background Nongovernment medical institutions have gradually become a significant part of China's healthcare system, with a growing numbers of staff. However, the current status of anesthesiology staff in these institutions is unclear. To gain insight into this situation and to compare it with public hospitals, the national anesthesia professional committee of the Chinese Nongovernment Medical Institutions Association (CNMIA) designed and conducted the national cross‐sectional survey. Methods We conducted a national cross‐sectional study to investigate the occupational and health status of anesthesiology staff in Nongovernment medical institutions. Additional questions were included for the directors of the anesthesiology department to understand their work stress and the reasons for employee turnover. The electronic questionnaire was created using Questionnaire Star and distributed by Anesthesia Professional Committee of the CNMIA through the QR code links and WeChat. Results A total of 1111 questionnaires were collected, including 989 from anesthesiologists and 122 from nurse anesthetists. The overall job satisfaction score (MSQ) was 75.57 ± 12.32 and the average fatigue score (MFI‐20) was 49.10 ± 10.90. High‐risk factors for severe fatigue included being aged 31–40, holding a middle title, frequently working night shifts, having long working hours, and participating surgeries classified as ASA III or higher. The most common disease reported was difficulty falling asleep/insomnia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that men (OR = 0.662, 95% CI: 0.482–0.909, p
medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services,medical informatics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?