Classification and Regression Tree Predictive Model for Acute Kidney Injury in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
Ruoran Wang,Jing Zhang,Min He,Jianguo Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s435281
2024-02-22
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Abstract:Ruoran Wang, 1, &ast Jing Zhang, 1, &ast Min He, 2 Jianguo Xu 1 1 Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Jianguo Xu, Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China, Email Min He, Department of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, People's Republic of China, Email Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is prevalent in hospitalized patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), and increases the risk of poor outcomes. We designed this study to develop a visual and convenient decision-tree-based model for predicting AKI in TBI patients. Methods: A total of 376 patients admitted to the emergency department of the West China Hospital for TBI between January 2015 and June 2019 were included. Demographic information, vital signs on admission, laboratory test results, radiological signs, surgical options, and medications were recorded as variables. AKI was confirmed since the second day after admission, based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. We constructed two predictive models for AKI using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and classification and regression tree (CART), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of these two predictive models were drawn, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to compare their predictive accuracy. Results: The incidence of AKI on the second day after admission was 10.4% among patients with TBI. Lasso regression identified five potent predictive factors for AKI: glucose, serum creatinine, cystatin C, serum uric acid, and fresh frozen plasma transfusions. The CART analysis showed that glucose, serum uric acid, and cystatin C ranked among the top three in terms of the feature importance of the decision tree model. The AUC value of the decision-tree predictive model was 0.892, which was higher than the 0.854 of the LASSO regression model, although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The decision tree model is valuable for predicting AKI among patients with TBI. This tree-based flowchart is convenient for physicians to identify patients with TBI who are at high risk of AKI and prompts them to develop suitable therapeutic strategies. Keywords: acute kidney injury, decision tree, traumatic brain injury, prediction, machine learning Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a widespread complication that occurs in 7.6–24% of hospitalized patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). 1–5 AKI can increase the risk of mortality and prolong the length of hospital stay among patients with TBI] 1,5–7 The high prevalence of AKI in TBI may be caused by pathophysiological processes after the initial brain injury, including systemic inflammation, excessive sympathetic activation, hypoperfusion, and the common use of nephrotoxic medications such as hypertonic saline, blood product transfusion, and nephrotoxic antibiotics. 8–10 The lack of drugs to alleviate and prevent renal injury emphasizes the importance of identifying patients with TBI who are at a high risk of AKI in the early stages. For TBI patients with a high likelihood of developing renal dysfunction, physicians should cautiously use or even withdraw nephrotoxic drugs and operations and try to maintain stable hemodynamics. Several studies have identified various risk factors for AKI and developed predictive models for AKI in patients with TBI using conventional logistic or Cox regression. 3,11–13 Compared to this conventional statistical method, machine learning has attracted much attention from researchers because of its advantages, such as handling complex datasets effectively and performing well in analyzing nonlinear data. 14 Many studies have used various machine learning algorithms to predict outcomes, including the mortality and functional status of patients with TBI. 15–19 However, few studies have explored the value of machine learning algorithms in predicting perioperative complications, especially AKI, in patients with TBI. As a classic machine learning algorithm, the decision tree algorithm has several advantages, including a fast calculation speed, convenient visualization, and applicability for high-dimensional data. It has been widely used to evaluate -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services