Abstract:Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity.Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm.Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567).Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage.Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity. Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm. Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567). Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage. Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123 Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Retrospective evaluation of adjuvant capecitabine dosing patterns in triple negative breast cancer

The adjuvant use of capecitabine for residual disease following pre-operative chemotherapy for breast cancer: Challenges applying CREATE-X to a US population

Meta-Analysis Of Capecitabine-Based Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine-Free Chemotherapy In Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract PO5-03-09: Concurrent versus sequential use of adjuvant capecitabine and radiation in patients with triple-negative breast cancer with residual disease: A retrospective review

Abstract GS1-08: Adjuvant capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide plus epirubicin for triple-negative breast cancer (cbcsg010): An open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Tolerance and safety of adjuvant metronomic capecitabine in Indian patients with non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): An institutional experience.

Does the Dose of Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy Affect the Triple-negative Breast Cancer Benefit from Extended Capecitabine Metronomic Therapy? an Exploratory Analysis of the SYSUCC-001 Trial

424PD Individualization of docetaxel (DTX) treatment in East-Asian advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided dosing strategy: an open-label randomized clinical trial

Combining Adjuvant Radiotherapy With Capecitabine in Chemotherapy-resistant Breast Cancer: Feasibility, Safety, and Toxicity

Additional capecitabine use in early-stage triple negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a new era? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The role of capecitabine-based neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Real-world assessment of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) tolerability in patients with localized colorectal cancer undergoing curative-intent therapy: A comprehensive single institution analysis.

The Clinical Value of Chemotherapy Combined With Capecitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer—A Meta-Analysis

Effect of Capecitabine Maintenance Therapy Using Lower Dosage and Higher Frequency Vs Observation on Disease-Free Survival among Patients with Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Had Received Standard Treatment: the SYSUCC-001 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Adjuvant Capecitabine with Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide Plus Epirubicin for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (CBCSG010): an Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial

The effect of standard dose of neo/adjuvant chemotherapy on the benefit from capecitabine maintenance therapy: an exploratory analysis from SYSUCC-001 trial

CREATE-X a role for capecitabine in early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of available data

Real-world data on adjuvant capecitabine after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer

Capecitabine monotherapy: safe and effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Efficacy of adjuvant capecitabine in residual triple negative breast cancer: a multicenter observational Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study

Feasibility and Tolerability of Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Patients With Breast Cancer and Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Clinical Trial