Abstract:Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have the potential to revolutionize clinical practices, including improving diagnostic accuracy and surgical decision-making, while also reducing costs and manpower. However, it is important to recognize that these systems may perpetuate social inequities or demonstrate biases, such as those based on race or gender. Such biases can occur before, during, or after the development of AI models, making it critical to understand and address potential biases to enable the accurate and reliable application of AI models in clinical settings. To mitigate bias concerns during model development, we surveyed recent publications on different debiasing methods in the fields of biomedical natural language processing (NLP) or computer vision (CV). Then we discussed the methods, such as data perturbation and adversarial learning, that have been applied in the biomedical domain to address bias. Methods: We performed our literature search on PubMed, ACM digital library, and IEEE Xplore of relevant articles published between January 2018 and December 2023 using multiple combinations of keywords. We then filtered the result of 10,041 articles automatically with loose constraints, and manually inspected the abstracts of the remaining 890 articles to identify the 55 articles included in this review. Additional articles in the references are also included in this review. We discuss each method and compare its strengths and weaknesses. Finally, we review other potential methods from the general domain that could be applied to biomedicine to address bias and improve fairness. Results: The bias of AIs in biomedicine can originate from multiple sources such as insufficient data, sampling bias and the use of health-irrelevant features or race-adjusted algorithms. Existing debiasing methods that focus on algorithms can be categorized into distributional or algorithmic. Distributional methods include data augmentation, data perturbation, data reweighting methods, and federated learning. Algorithmic approaches include unsupervised representation learning, adversarial learning, disentangled representation learning, loss-based methods and causality-based methods.

Pseudo AI Bias

Bias, Fairness and Accountability with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms

Pruning techniques for artificial intelligence networks: a deeper look at their engineering design and bias: the first review of its kind

Bias in Artificial Intelligence Systems

The Technology of Outrage: Bias in Artificial Intelligence

Addressing Bias and Fairness Issues in Artificial Intelligence

A survey of recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in biomedicine

Bias Amplification in Artificial Intelligence Systems

Bias and Fairness in Artificial Intelligence: Methods and Mitigation Strategies

False consensus biases AI against vulnerable stakeholders

How do people react to AI failure? Automation bias, algorithmic aversion, and perceived controllability

Bias, Fairness, and Accountability with AI and ML Algorithms

Auditing the AI auditors: A framework for evaluating fairness and bias in high stakes AI predictive models.

Rolling in the deep of cognitive and AI biases

Algorithmic bias: on the implicit biases of social technology

Bias in Generative AI

What does the public think about artificial intelligence?—A criticality map to understand bias in the public perception of AI

Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society

AI pitfalls and what not to do: mitigating bias in AI

Prejudiced against the Machine? Implicit Associations and the Transience of Algorithm Aversion