Effectiveness of secukinumab in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a European routine-care observational study

Christiansen,S. N.,Horskjaer Rasmussen,S.,Ostergaard,M.,Pons,M.,Michelsen,B.,Pavelka,K.,Codreanu,C.,Ciurea,A.,Glintborg,B.,Santos,M. J.,Sari,I.,Rotar,Z.,Gudbjornsson,B.,Macfarlane,G. J.,Relas,H.,Iannone,F.,Laas,K.,Wallman,J. K.,van de Sande,M.,Provan,S. A.,Castrejon,I.,Zavada,J.,Mogosan,C.,Nissen,M. J.,Loft,A. G.,Barcelos,A.,Erez,Y.,Pirkmajer,K. P.,Grondal,G.,Jones,G. T.,Hokkanen,A.-M.,Chimenti,M. S.,Vorobjov,S.,Di Giuseppe,D.,Kvien,T. K.,Otero-Varela,L.,van der Horst-Bruinsma,I.,Hetland,M. L.,Ornbjerg,L. M.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004166
2024-07-26
RMD Open
Abstract:Objectives To compare the treatment effectiveness of secukinumab in radiographic (r) versus non-radiographic (nr) axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients treated in routine care across Europe. Methods Prospectively collected data on secukinumab-treated axSpA patients with known radiographic status were pooled from nine countries. Remission rates based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Numeric Rating Scale (0–10), for example, pain ≤2/Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) ≤2 and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (ID) <1.3 after 6/12/24 months of secukinumab treatment were calculated. Remission and drug retention rates in r-axSpA versus nr-axSpA patients were compared by logistic and Cox regression models (unadjusted/adjusted for age+sex/adjusted for multiple confounders). Results Overall, 1161 secukinumab-treated patients were included (r-axSpA/nr-axSpA: 922/239). At baseline, r-axSpA patients had longer disease duration and higher C reactive protein, were more often male and HLA-B27 positive and had received fewer prior biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs compared with nr-axSpA patients, whereas PROs were largely similar. During follow-up, crude PRO remission rates were significantly higher in r-axSpA compared with nr-axSpA patients (6 months: pain≤2: 40%/28%, OR=1.7; BASDAI≤2: 37%/25%, OR=1.8), as were drug retention rates (24 months: 66%/58%, HR 0.73 (ref: r-axSpA)). Proportions of patients achieving ASDAS ID were low for both groups, particularly nr-axSpA (6 months: 11%/8%). However, when adjusting for age+sex, these differences diminished, and after adjusting for multiple confounders, no significant between-group differences remained for either remission or drug retention rates. Conclusion Crude remission/drug retention rates in European secukinumab-treated patients were higher in r-axSpA compared with nr-axSpA patients. In adjusted analyses, secukinumab effectiveness was similar in both groups, suggesting that observed differences were related to factors other than radiographic status.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?