Research, education and practice of tele-neurorehabilitation in low and middle-income countries: A Scoping Review

Dorcas B.C. Gandhi,Sureshkumar Kamalakannan,Jennifer V. Dsouza,Vinicius Montanaro,Nistara S. Chawla,Amreen Mahmood,Etienne Ngeh,Sania Zarreen,Pranay J. Vijayanand,John M. Solomon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-240053
2024-09-21
Neurorehabilitation
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Tele-neurorehabilitation (TNR) allows for remote delivery of rehabilitation services for those with neurological disabilities. Despite growing global interest and uptake, its adoption remains challenging in Low-and-Middle-Income-Countries (LMICs). OBJECTIVE: To explore available literature on the nature of training and education, research and practice of TNR in LMICs. METHODS: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines and predefined selection criteria, four databases were screened. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Relevant data was extracted to using a data extraction form in Microsoft Excel and were narratively synthesised under Education/training, Research and Clinical Practice of TNR. RESULTS: We identified no formal structured training courses/programs for TNR users/providers. Sessions were mainly delivered as part of a research project. The included studies highlighted the need to engage stakeholders in TNR research and improve digital-literacy among healthcare providers/users. Development and use of clinical decision-making-tools, models of TNR suitable for varied populations and prior area-mapping were a few suggestions for clinical/research practice. CONCLUSION: There is an immense need to develop academic/structured programs for TNR to build capacity among providers/users in LMICs. Practice must adhere to principles of safety, effectiveness, and based on high quality clinical-guidelines suitable to the context to ensure optimal uptake and practice of TNR in LMICs.
clinical neurology,rehabilitation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?