(163) VIABILITY OF TARGETED SCREENING FOR STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND MRSA AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR UNIVERSAL PREOPERATIVE INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS NASAL SCREENING

T Alvermann,BL Atwater,MS Gross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae167.160

2024-12-12

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are significant and preventable sources of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infection. SA and MRSA nasal carriers have increased risk of healthcare-related infections. Screening and prompt decolonization for nasal carriers of SA in the hospital setting has been shown to reduce postoperative SA hospital-associated surgical-site infections. Objective We determined if known epidemiologic risk factors for SA and MRSA were prevalent in our IPP patients who tested positive for SA or MRSA at their preoperative visit. Our hypothesis was that these determinants would help identify at-risk patients to better target preoperative SA and MRSA screening in the future. Methods This is a retrospective IRB-approved analysis of 62 asymptomatic patients who screened positive for either SA (n = 56) or MRSA (n = 6) via nasal culture prior to undergoing IPP placement at two hospitals in our practice. These two groups were evaluated separately to compare the presence of risk factors present for SA and MRSA prior to nasal screening. Known risk factors for SA include: intravenous drug use, diabetes, recent hospitalization within 30 days, immunocompromised status, healthcare employment, hemodialysis, HIV positive status, and prior prosthetic implant placement. Known risk factors for MRSA patients include: intravenous drug use, living in a correctional facility, residential home, or shelter, occupation as a veterinarian, recent influenza-like illness and/or severe pneumonia, concurrent skin/soft tissue infection, and history of MRSA. We examined the presence of these risk factors in patients who screened positive for nasal colonization to determine if they could have undergone targeted nasal screening. Results Our data are shown in Table 1. We found that the most common indicator for SA colonization in our population was diabetes in 16 of 56 patients (28.6%). We found the most common MRSA-specific risk factor was a history of MRSA in 1 of 6 patients (16.7%). No patient in this prescreened and pretreated cohort subsequently had IPP infection. Conclusions No known risk factor for SA and MRSA colonization was found to be widely prevalent in our SA and MRSA patient cohorts. Targeting screening based on known epidemiologic risk factors for SA and MRSA would not have been a useful substitute for universal preoperative nasal screening in our population. Universal preoperative nasal SA and MRSA screening and treatment may be a useful tool to potentially diminish postoperative IPP surgical-site infections. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast, MenMD.

urology & nephrology