Abstract:In the scientific community, different parameters such as, publications, citations, h-index and different variants of h-index are being used to rank the authors. Authors ranking assists in various objectives, including scientific domain expert's selection and subsequently utilizing their services for different purposes. It can also be used in ranking institutions, selecting journal's editors, tenure appointments and awarding promotions. There is a need to nominate the best performing index that can rank the authors in a best possible way. All of the existing parameters are either examined on fictional case scenarios or on insufficient datasets belonging to different fields, due to which it is hard to figure out the comparative performance of each index. In order to strongly validate the performance of each individual index these indices should be examined on the large size dataset. This research focuses attention on the evaluation of h-index and some of its variants, both quantitative and qualitative for ranking authors. All these indices are evaluated on a large size dataset belonging to the field of Neuroscience. To evaluate the results of these indices award winners of five different Neuroscience societies are considered as a benchmark. This study will be helpful in distinguishing more dominant authors based on the evaluation results of these quantitative and qualitative indices. In order to evaluate the results obtained from these indices, firstly the correlation among the indices is calculated. Most of the indices such as h-index, hg-index, R-index and m-quotient have strong correlation among them. However, the correlation of f-index with all other indices is weak, which indicates that ranking achieved by the f-index is not similar to others. Secondly the occurrence of award winners in ranked list of each index is calculated and contribution of each index in bringing awardees in top position is checked. None of the index brought 100% of awardees in top positions of the ranking. In quantitative indices hg-index brought maximum 52% awardees in top 10% of its ranked list. While in qualitative indices R-index validated itself as a best performing index by ranking 52% awardees in top 10% of its ranked list. Moreover, it is analyzed that most of the award winners belonging to the SfN (Society for Neuroscience) and CNS (Cognitive Neuroscience Society) lies on the top positions of ranked lists obtained from h-index and hg-index which specify that there might be a relationship between SfN, NAS and the h and hg-indices.

Indices to Quantify the Ranking of Arabic Journals and Research Output

Analysis of Generalized Impact Factor and Indices of Journals

The Arabic Citation Index -- Toward a better understanding of Arab scientific literature

Evaluation of h-index and its citation intensity based variants in the field of mathematics

A figure of merit that includes 5 distinct performance indicators to improve research evaluation of academic scholars'

A Quantitative Evaluation System of Chinese Journals in the Humanities and Social Sciences

Evaluation of h-index and its qualitative and quantitative variants in Neuroscience

Quantitative analysis of automatic performance evaluation systems based on the h-index

Analyzing research performance: proposition of a new complementary index

Chemistry journals and research trends in Arab countries: A bibliometric analysis

Arab Initiatives for Open Access: The Platform of Algerian Scientific Journals as a Model

A review on h-index and its alternative indices

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output

Which journal ranking list? A case study in business and economics

Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of Integrative and Complementary Medicine: a bibliometric analysis

The strike rate index: a new index for journal quality based on journal size and the h-index of citations

The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers

H-index and research evaluation: A suggested set of components for developing a comprehensive author-level index

h-index and its alternative: A Review

Indexed journals with no or low article processing charges: An alternative publishing venue for Pakistani researchers

Two fast algorithms for computation of h-index