Thorium‐uranium close fuel cycle in fluoride‐salt‐cooled solid‐fuel fast reactor with two recycle strategies

Yu Peng,Guifeng Zhu,Yang Zou,Hongjie Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6168
IF: 4.6
2020-11-23
International Journal of Energy Research
Abstract:<p>Fluoride‐salt‐cooled solid‐fuel fast reactor (LSFR) based on thorium fuel could achieve a self‐sustaining core which satisfies long term energy supply. In this paper, we further investigated the LSFR core neutronics characteristics for the close fuel cycle from the 0th cycle core to the 8th cycle core. Two fuel recycle schemes, including U recycling and U/Pu/MA recycling, were put forward to evaluate physical effects caused by these recycling elements. It was found that both closed fuel recycle schemes gained self‐sustaining core and reduced the <sup>233</sup>U fuel loading, indicating that recycling nuclides could partially replace <sup>233</sup>U. Due to the lower <sup>233</sup>U loading in fuel cycle process, the breeding performance of LSFR core was better and U/Pu/MA recycling scheme possessed more advantages. The LSFR core could not transmute MA due to the relatively soft fast energy spectrum. The U/Pu/MA recycle scheme accumulated more transuranium elements with cycle burnup than that of U recycle scheme.</p>
energy & fuels,nuclear science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?