Bringing together the World Health Organization's QualityRights initiative and the World Psychiatric Association's programme on implementing alternatives to coercion in mental healthcare: a common goal for action

Neeraj Gill,Natalie Drew,Maria Rodrigues,Hassan Muhsen,Guadalupe Morales Cano,Martha Savage,Soumitra Pathare,John Allan,Silvana Galderisi,Afzal Javed,Helen Herrman,Michelle Funk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.622
2024-01-01
BJPsych Open
Abstract:Background Stakeholders worldwide increasingly acknowledge the need to address coercive practices in mental healthcare. Options have been described and evaluated in several countries, as noted recently in major policy documents from the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Psychiatric Association (WPA). The WHO's QualityRights initiative promotes human rights and quality of care for persons with mental health conditions and psychosocial disabilities. A position statement from the WPA calls for implementation of alternatives to coercion in mental healthcare. Aims We describe the engagement of both the WHO and WPA in this work. We discuss their mutual aim to support countries in improving human rights and quality of care, as well as the differences between these two organisations in their stated goals related to coercion in mental healthcare: the WHO's approach to eliminate coercion and the WPA's goal to implement alternatives to coercion. Method We outline and critically analyse the common ground between the two organisations, which endorse a similar range of rights-based approaches to promoting non-coercive practices in service provision, including early intervention in prevention and care and other policy and practice changes. Results Advocacy and action based on an agreed need to find practical solutions and advances in this area have the power to build consensus and unify key actors. Conclusions We conclude that persons with lived experience, families, mental health professionals and policy makers are now coming together in several parts of the world to work toward the common goals of improving quality, promoting human rights and addressing coercion in mental health services.
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to reduce or eliminate coercive practices in mental health care in order to improve service quality and protect human rights. Specifically, the paper explores the common goals and differences between the QualityRights initiative of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the "Implementing Alternative Coercive Measures" project of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), aiming to support countries in improving human rights and quality in mental health services. At the same time, it proposes a series of strategies and suggestions to achieve these goals. ### Background - **Global Consensus**: Global stakeholders are increasingly aware of the need to address coercive practices in mental health care. - **Policy Documents**: Recently released policy documents by WHO and WPA describe and evaluate options in this area in multiple countries. - **QualityRights Initiative**: The WHO's QualityRights initiative aims to promote the rights and quality of care for people with mental disorders. - **WPA Position Statement**: The WPA calls for the implementation of alternative coercive measures in mental health care. ### Goals - **Participation of WHO and WPA**: The paper describes the participation of WHO and WPA in this work. - **Common Goals**: Discuss the common goals of the two organizations in supporting countries to improve human rights and quality of care. - **Differences**: Analyze the different goals of the two organizations in dealing with coercive practices in mental health care: WHO's goal is to eliminate coercive practices, while WPA's goal is to implement alternative measures. ### Methods - **Common Ground**: Outline and critically analyze the common ground between the two organizations. They both support a rights - based approach to promote non - coercive practices, including early intervention, prevention and care, as well as other policy and practice changes. ### Results - **Consensus and Unification**: Based on the need for practical solutions, advocacy and action can build consensus and unify key players. ### Conclusions - **Common Goals**: The paper concludes that people with lived experience, family members, mental health professionals and policy - makers are working together around the world towards the common goals of improving quality, promoting human rights and addressing coercive practices in mental health services. ### Keywords - Coercion; Mental Health Care; Human Rights; Involuntary Treatment; Mental Health Conditions. ### Formula This article does not involve specific mathematical, physical, chemical or biological formulas, so there is no need to present formulas in Markdown format. ### Summary By analyzing the efforts of WHO and WPA to reduce or eliminate coercive practices in mental health care, this paper emphasizes the common goals and differences of these two organizations in promoting human rights and quality of care. The paper proposes specific strategies and suggestions to support countries in making progress in this area.