Abstract:Cognitive warfare is not new. Weaker parties in an asymmetric conflict have manipulated information and ideas to convince stronger opponents to not fight (e.g., the Trojan Horse). What is new is the extent to which technologies enable cognitive warfare – resulting in the delegitimization of governments by sowing discord and creating division in order to compel acceptance of political will Information sharing tools enable adversaries to interfere more directly than ever with national political processes as well as citizens minds3. Cognitive warfare is considered a new domain of warfare, along with land, maritime, air, space and cyber (technical). The goal of cognitive warfare attacks is to alter or mislead the thoughts of leaders and operators, of members of entire social or professional classes, of the men and women in an army, or on a larger scale, of an entire population in a given region, country or group of countries and impact territory, influence, service interruptions, transportation, etc. The means could be social cyber, cyber technical, electronic warfare, and broadcast, etc. Senior officers and strategists in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) claim that AI, neuroscience, and digital applications (e.g., social media) will be able to influence enemies by affecting human cognition directly, Russia’s Gerasimov doctrine talks of the “battlespace of the mind”, Pocheptsov provides examples including creation of fake events and objects and organizing protest actions in Ukraine. Dr Giordano stated, “the brain is the battlefield of the future”. This paper will highlight current examples of cognitive warfare, touch on enabling technologies and relevant social science principles of influence (cognitive and social), highlight existing analytics, introduce the “House model” which identifies pillars of relevant fields of knowledge as well as operationally relevant aspects related to the pillars as potentially helpful framework for thinking about cognitive warfare and identifying needed research.

Decision-Centric Warfare: Reading Between the Lines of Network-Centric Warfare

Re-Envisioning Command and Control

Implications for studying team cognition and team performance in network-centric warfare paradigms

Network-Centric Warfare and Information Technology: The Stock Market as a Historical Model

Building-Environment Control With Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks: Centralized Versus Distributed

Cognitive Warfare – Beyond Dominance, Manoeuvres and Information – The Battle for the Imagined Future

Military Electronic Systems for Command and Control

Strategic Competition and Crisis Wargame: Integrating a Dynamic Reputation Model to Enhance the Strategic Competition and Crisis Wargame for the Center for Army Analysis

War of 2050: a Battle for Information, Communications, and Computer Security

Combining information centric and software defined networking to support command and control agility in military mobile networks

Integrated computation, communication and control: towards next revolution in information technology

Social Network Modeling and Simulation of Integrated Resilient Command and Control (C2) in Contested Cyber Environments

The use of military strategy in network-centric warfare

Analysis on Technology Development of NCW and Tactical Data Link

A Method for Selecting Decision Center of Heterogeneous Operational Networks Based on Operational Capability Analysis

Opportunities and Directions for the Evolution of Command and Control Systems in the Context of Multi-domain Operations

D-CEWS: DEVS-Based Cyber-Electronic Warfare M&S Framework for Enhanced Communication Effectiveness Analysis in Battlefield

Framework for Interoperable Command & Control of Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations

A multi-criteria, network analytic approach to war game participant selection

Conditions for Normative Decision Making at the Fire Ground

New perspectives on cognitive warfare