Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle enhanced percutaneous microwave ablation: Ex‐vivo characterization using magnetic resonance thermometry

Sharath K. Bhagavatula,Sajanlal R. Panikkanvalappil,Junichi Tokuda,Vincent Levesque,Zuzana Tatarova,Guigen Liu,John E. Markert,Oliver Jonas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17040
IF: 4.506
2024-03-23
Medical Physics
Abstract:Background Percutaneous microwave ablation (pMWA) is a minimally invasive procedure that uses a microwave antenna placed at the tip of a needle to induce lethal tissue heating. It can treat cancer and other diseases with lower morbidity than conventional surgery, but one major limitation is the lack of control over the heating region around the ablation needle. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles have the potential to enhance and control pMWA heating due to their ability to absorb microwave energy and their ease of local delivery. Purpose The purpose of this study is to experimentally quantify the capabilities of FDA‐approved superparamagnetic iron oxide Feraheme nanoparticles (FHNPs) to enhance and control pMWA heating. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of locally injected FHNPs in increasing the maximum temperature during pMWA and to investigate the ability of FHNPs to create a controlled ablation zone around the pMWA needle. Methods PMWA was performed using a clinical ablation system at 915 MHz in ex‐vivo porcine liver tissues. Prior to ablation, 50 uL 5 mg/mL FHNP injections were made on one side of the pMWA needle via a 23‐gauge needle. Local temperatures at the FHNP injection site were directly compared to equidistant control sites without FHNP. First, temperatures were compared using directly inserted thermocouples. Next, temperatures were measured non‐invasively using magnetic resonance thermometry (MRT), which enabled comprehensive four‐dimensional (volumetric and temporal) assessment of heating effects relative to nanoparticle distribution, which was quantified using dual‐echo ultrashort echo time (UTE) subtraction MR imaging. Maximum heating within FHNP‐exposed tissues versus control tissues were compared at multiple pMWA energy delivery settings. The ability to generate a controlled asymmetric ablation zone using multiple FHNP injections was also tested. Finally, intra‐procedural MRT‐derived heat maps were correlated with gold standard gross pathology using Dice similarity analysis. Results Maximum temperatures at the FHNP injection site were significantly higher than control (without FHNP) sites when measured using direct thermocouples (93.1 ± 6.0°C vs. 57.2 ± 8.1°C, p = 0.002) and using non‐invasive MRT (115.6 ± 13.4°C vs. 49.0 ± 10.6°C, p = 0.02). Temperature difference between FHNP‐exposed and control sites correlated with total energy deposition: 66.6 ± 17.6°C, 58.1 ± 8.5°C, and 20.8 ± 9.2°C at high (17.5 ± 2.2 kJ), medium (13.6 ± 1.8 kJ), and low (8.8 ± 1.1 kJ) energies, respectively (all pairwise p
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?