Power structure modeling for group purchasing with differentiated competing manufacturers under economies of scale
Mao-sen ZHOU,Bin DAN,Yu ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13587/j.cnki.jieem.2017.03.024
2017-01-01
Abstract:With the current market environment characterized by intense competition,high variability and diversified demand,an increasing number of manufacturers have chosen small batch production mode.In this context,group purchasing has been increasingly viewed as effective in reducing cost and improving performance.Through group purchasing,manufacturers can realize economies of scale by aggregating their purchasing volume.However,during the decision process of group purchasing,inappropriate power structure will result in incentive misalignment and efficiency reduction.To address this problem,we study a group-purchasing supply chain that consists of one group purchasing organization(GPO) and two manufacturers competing in quantity.The GPO purchases a common component from vendors with a quantity discount cost,then provides the component for each manufacturer at a corresponding transfer price.The manufacturers further process it to make imperfectly substitutable products.After considering power structure differences,and environmental factors,such as product differentiation and economies of scale,we constructed three types of models,including the centralized decision-making model and two Stackelberg game models dominated by the GPO and manufacturers,respectively.Based on the solutions,we derive the optimal quantity of the system for each manufacturer,and the equilibrium quantity and transfer price under each power structure.On this basis,we analyze the effect of environmental factors on the equilibriums,and consequently compare system profits under different power structures with numerical examples.Our study shows that both optimal quantity and system profit are increasing in product differentiation,but unimodal with respect to the economy of scale.The quantities under both power structures will not exceed the optimum,and can reach the optimum if the economy of scale is high enough.More interestingly,different from the GPO's dominance,the quantity under the manufacturers' dominance may be zero under certain conditions,that is,group purchasing may be failed.We also explore the sensitivity of the equilibrium decisions under different power structures.When the economy of scale is high enough,the quantities under both structures have the same sensitivity as the optimal quantity,but the transfer prices under different structures have opposite sensitivity to product differentiation.Besides,when the economy of scale is relatively low,it has positive effect on quantity under both structures,but it may have opposite effect on transfer price under different structures.Moreover,contrary to GPO's dominance,the effect of product differentiation on quantity and transfer price under manufacturers' dominance may be negative and positive,respectively.Finally,the applicability of each power structure is analyzed by comparison.We find that if the economy of scale is high enough,both structures can realize system optimum.Besides,the system profit under the GPO's dominance can be higher only if both the economy of scale and the product differentiation are relatively high.If the economy of scale is relatively low and product differentiation is moderate,the system profit is higher under the manufacturers'dominance.We also find that when manufacturers dominate,more power does not necessarily guarantee them higher profits,but benefits both the GPO and the supply chain,especially when both the economy of scale and product differentiation are low enough.In summary,this paper studies the decisions and performances of group purchasing under different power structures by employing the game theory.The findings in this paper can provide academic and practical insights for group purchasing.