Reduced Visuospatial Attention in Personal Space is Not Limited to the Affected Limb in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s437366
IF: 2.8319
2024-04-23
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Monika Halicka, 1– 3 Olivia Rose Cousins, 3 Antonia F Ten Brink, 2– 4 Axel D Vittersø, 2, 3, 5 Michael J Proulx, 3 Janet H Bultitude 2, 3 1 Institute of Neuroscience, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; 2 Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK; 3 Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK; 4 Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 5 Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway Correspondence: Monika Halicka, Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS), Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, B1.53.04, 1200 Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Brussels, Belgium, Email Purpose: Alterations in spatial attention have been reported in people with chronic pain and may be relevant to understanding its cortical mechanisms and developing novel treatments. There is conflicting evidence as to whether people with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) have reduced visuospatial attention to their affected limb and/or its surrounding space, with some evidence that these deficits may be greater in personal (bodily) space. We aimed to test the competing hypotheses of whether the visuospatial attentional bias is specific to the personal space of the affected limb or generalizes to the personal space of other parts of the affected side of the body. Patients and Methods: Using visual Temporal Order Judgement tasks, we measured spatial attention in the personal space of the hands and feet of patients with upper (n=14) or lower (n=14) limb CRPS and pain-free controls (n=17). Participants judged the order of two light flashes presented at different temporal offsets on each of their hands or feet. Slower processing of the flash on one side relative to the other reflects reduced attention to that side of space. Results: Controls prioritized stimuli on the non-dominant (left) relative to dominant side, consistent with the well-documented normal leftward bias of attention (ie "pseudoneglect"). Regardless of the location (upper or lower limb) of the pain or visual stimuli, people with CRPS showed no such asymmetry, representing reduced attention to the affected side (compared to the greater attention of controls to their non-dominant side). More severe CRPS symptoms were associated with a greater tendency to deprioritize stimuli on the affected side. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that relative visuospatial bias in CRPS is generalized to the personal space of the affected side of the body, rather than being specific to the personal space of the CRPS-affected limb. Keywords: complex regional pain syndrome, spatial attention, personal space, pseudoneglect, temporal order judgement, chronic pain Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a condition characterized by limb pain, as well as sensory, autonomic, motor, and trophic signs and symptoms. 1 Studies of people with CRPS have reported distorted perception and mental representation of the affected limb, 2–12 as well as "neglect-like" symptoms: reduced attention to the affected limb and its surrounding space, relative to the unaffected side, reminiscent of neglect of the contralesional side of space that can follow brain damage. 10,13 This contrasts to the slight leftward bias in spatial attention typical of the general healthy population (referred to as "pseudoneglect"). 14 The magnitude of neglect-like symptoms in CRPS correlated with greater severity of pain and other clinical symptoms in some studies, 15–22 but not others. 18,23–28 Therefore, there is a need to better understand how spatial attention is altered in CRPS compared to healthy controls. Several studies have examined attention bias in CRPS using Temporal Order Judgement (TOJ) tasks. In TOJ tasks, participants indicate the relative order of two stimuli presented one on each side of space with different temporal offsets. Using this method, it is possible to determine if stimuli on one side of space are subject to less attention, and therefore processed more slowly and reported to be ordered second, relative to stimuli on the other side of space (altering their perceived order). 29 Studies using this method revealed that people with CRPS were slower to process stimuli presented on, or near their affected limb, or in the corresponding side of space relative to stimuli presented on their unaffected side of the body or space. 15,16,20,24,26 That is, they showed a spatial attention bias away from the CRPS-affected side. More recent studies using similar TOJ paradigms, however, found no evide -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology