Risk Factors for Midline Catheter Failure: A Secondary Analysis of an Existing Trial
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S383502
2022-10-08
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Abstract:Amit Bahl, 1 Steven Johnson, 1 Nicholas Mielke, 2 Nai-Wei Chen 3 1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA; 2 Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA; 3 Research Institute, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA Correspondence: Amit Bahl, Department of Emergency Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, 3601 13 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA, Email Objective: While midline catheters (MCs) are considered to be a reliable form of vascular access, up to 25% of the placements culminate in failure. We aimed to explore risk factors for MC failure. Methods: We performed an analysis of existing randomized controlled trial data involving a comparison of two midline catheters. The study aimed to assess risk factors related to MC failure, including patient, procedure, catheter, and vein characteristics. Cox regression was used for univariable and multivariable analyses to evaluate the association between characteristics and MC failure. Results: Among 191 patients that were included in this secondary analysis, more patients were female (114/191 [59.7%]) and average age was 60.2 (SD = 16.7) years. Clinical indications for MC placement included antibiotics (60.7%), difficult venous access (32.5%), or both (6.8%). In a univariable Cox regression analysis, the increase in pulse rate (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00– 1.04; P =0.02), temperature ≥ 38°C (HR 5.59; 95% CI, 1.96– 15.94; P =0.001), oxygen saturation < 93% (HR 2.91; 95% CI, 1.03– 8.24; P =0.04), norepinephrine in dextrose infusion (HR 2.41; 95% CI, 1.17– 4.97; P =0.02) and cephalic vein insertion (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.09– 5.57; P =0.03) were all associated with higher risk of MC failure. In a multivariable Cox model, difficult venous access (aHR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.04– 4.05; P =0.04) and norepinephrine in dextrose (aHR 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09– 4.82; P =0.03) was associated with catheter failure. Conclusion: Elevated pulse rate, decreased oxygen saturation level, temperature ≥ 38°C, and norepinephrine use were each associated with an increased risk of MC failure. These factors should be considered when selecting the most appropriate vascular access device for individual patients. Additionally, the cephalic vein insertion has the highest risk for MC failure and other access points could be preferentially considered. Keywords: midline catheter, complications, risk factors, midline catheter failure, vesicants, vascular access With over 850,000 midline catheters (MCs) sold in the United States in 2019, establishing peripheral venous access with these devices is steadily gaining popularity. 1 MCs are designed for intermediate duration intravenous therapies, generally ranging from 5 to 14 days and in some instances, greater than 15 days. 2,3 They are typically inserted in the upper extremity, with the tip of the catheter located proximal to the axilla, but one study demonstrated successful placement in the femoral vein in the groin. 4 MCs have been shown to be reliable across numerous investigations; however, a minority of these catheters do fail prior to completion of therapy, and risk factors for catheter failure are currently unknown. 2,5–8 Nonetheless, there is some limited data on the premature removal rate of MCs. One systematic review, that included 31 individual manuscripts, reported a incidence range for MC failure of 2.6–57%, with an overall adjusted rate of 12.5%. 5 Patients who experience MC failure have a multitude of downstream sequela as a result, including the need for repeat invasive procedures, venous depletion from repeated IV needlesticks, escalation to more invasive central venous access devices with associated higher risk profiles, extravasation with skin necrosis, catheter-associated bloodstream infections, interruption of medical therapies, and longer hospital stays. 7,9,10 To date, there are limited data describing outcomes after MC failure and even less literature evaluating potential risk factors that may predict MC failure. In order to select the most effective and safest vascular access device for any given patient, it is imperative that we understand what potential risk factors may preclude MC use. Additionally, identifying a patient population that is low risk for premature MC failure would be just as beneficial. We believe that several variables including demographics, clinical, procedural, and line/vein characteristics may influence survival and help us better understand catheter failure. Thus, the goal of this analysis is to identify risk factors that are predictive of premature MC failure in order to help identify w -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services