Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions and their drivers at different spatial scales in the Yellow River Basin

Qi Liu,Jiajun Qiao,Mengjuan Li,Mengjiao Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168486

2024-01-01

Abstract:Accurately understanding ecosystem service (ES) interactions and an analysis of the complex, multiscale driving mechanisms are foundational prerequisites for implementing effective multiscale ES management. This study dives into the spatial and temporal variations of ES interactions in the Yellow River Basin across four spatial scales. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model is later deployed to pinpoint the key drivers of ecosystem services and their indirect pathways to ESs are illuminated utilizing Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that (1) The synergistic effect between ES pairs in the Yellow River Basin surpasses that of trade-offs. Various types of ecosystem service bundles have transformed into each other from 2000 to 2020, and the spatial patterns of ES interactions bear resemblances at different scales. (2) The factors driving habitat quality (HQ), carbon sequestration (CS), and landscape aesthetics (LA) are mainly the landscape configuration and biophysical conditions. The factor driving food production (FP) is mainly the level of urbanization, whereas soil conservation (SC) and water yield (WY) are mainly subject to climate. (3) When biophysical conditions and level of urbanization serve as mediating variables in pathways, driving factors invariably have negative indirect effects on ESs. When landscape configuration serves as a mediating variable, biophysical conditions positively influence HQ and CS, and negatively impact FP, WY, and LA. Conversely, the level of urbanization negatively affects all ESs. (4) The combination of XGBoost and PLS-SEM offers a comprehensive and innovative lens for analyzing ESs driving mechanisms. Based on our findings, scientific management of ESs should account not only for the direct impacts of driving elements but also for their scale and indirect effects.

environmental sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The key problem that this paper attempts to solve lies in accurately understanding the interactions among ecosystem services (ESs) and their complex, multi - scale driving mechanisms, in order to achieve effective multi - scale ES management. Specifically:

1. **Analysis of Spatio - Temporal Heterogeneity**: The research aims to explore the spatio - temporal heterogeneity of ecosystem service interactions in the Yellow River Basin at four different spatial scales. This helps to more comprehensively understand the synergy effects and trade - off relationships among ecosystem services.

2. **Identification of Driving Factors**: By combining machine - learning models (such as XGBoost) and partial least squares structural equation models (PLS - SEM), the research attempts to determine the key driving factors affecting ecosystem services and reveal the direct and indirect influence paths of these driving factors on ecosystem services.

3. **Multi - scale Comprehensive Analysis**: Most previous studies have focused on a single spatial or temporal scale, while this study considers both time and multiple spatial scales simultaneously to more widely reveal the scale effects and dynamic changes of ecosystem service interactions.

### Research Background

Ecosystem services are all the direct or indirect benefits that humans obtain from ecosystems. In the past half - century, the supply of two - thirds of the global ecosystem services has declined significantly. Therefore, it is urgent to accurately understand the interactions among ecosystem services and their key driving factors in order to achieve scientific and effective management and promote regional sustainable development.

### Main Methods

1. **Data Sources and Processing**:
- Raster and statistical data are used to measure ecosystem services.
- The data are resampled, projected, and normalized to ensure data consistency and comparability.

2. **Quantification of Ecosystem Services**:
- Six representative ecosystem services are selected: habitat quality (HQ), carbon sequestration (CS), soil conservation (SC), food production (FP), water resource supply (WY), and landscape aesthetics (LA).
- The InVEST model and statistical data analysis are used to analyze the specific quantification methods of these services.

3. **Quantification of Ecosystem Service Interactions**:
- The synergy effects and trade - off relationships between pairs of ecosystem services at different scales are evaluated through correlation analysis and the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model.
- Self - organizing maps (SOM) are used to identify ecosystem service bundles.

4. **Analysis of Driving Factors**:
- The XGBoost model is used to determine the key driving factors affecting ecosystem services and compare its performance with other machine - learning models (such as random forest RF and generalized additive model GAM).
- The PLS - SEM model is further used to analyze the direct and indirect influence paths of driving factors on ecosystem services.

### Research Innovations

1. **Spatio - Temporal Multi - scale Analysis**: By combining time series and multiple spatial scales, the understanding of ecosystem service interactions is enriched.
2. **New Analysis Framework**: A novel analysis framework that combines machine - learning models with PLS - SEM is constructed.
3. **Direct and Indirect Response Mechanisms**: The direct and indirect response mechanisms of driving factors to ecosystem services at different spatial scales are explored, providing a theoretical reference for management and decision - making.

### Conclusion

Through in - depth analysis of the spatio - temporal heterogeneity and driving mechanisms of ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin, the research provides important theoretical basis and practical guidance for scientific management and protection of ecosystem services.