Abstract:Manuscript Type: EmpiricalResearch Question/Issue: On April 2005, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) launched the split-share structure reform to mitigate principal-principal agency problems. Using the reform as an exogenous shock, we examine the impact of principal-principal agency problems on stock price crash risk. Specifically, this study attempts to answer two questions: (1) Does the split-share structure reform in China decrease stock price crash risk? (2) Is the above effect induced by the mitigation of principal-principal agency problems?Research Findings/Insights: We find that the reform induces a significant decrease in crash risk after controlling for other predictors of crash risk, and this effect is more pronounced in firms with a higher proportion of shares held by controlling shareholders. Moreover, we find that the negative impact of the reform on stock price crash risk is more pronounced in firms with a high level of tunneling prior to the reform, which indicates that reform induces less tunneling, and adversely affects crash risk.Theoretical/Academic Implications: This study contributes to the literature in two ways. First, this study constitutes the first effort to explore the determinants of stock price crash risk from the perspective of principal-principal agency problems. Second, this study enriches the growing literature on the economic consequences of the split-share structure reform in China.Practitioner/Policy Implications: We draw two important implications from our results. First, our findings highlight that regulatory intervention is an important way to enhance corporate governance. This is particularly beneficial in China, a transitional economy which may lag in terms of general protection of investors and information disclosure. Second, this study also confirms that minority shareholders and listed firms benefit from the reform. Both are crucial to the healthy development of the capital market in China.

Near or far? An investigation into the relationship between spatial proximity to CSRC district offices and stock crash risk

Internal Control and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

The Role of Bad-News Coverage and Media Environments in Crash Risk Around the World

CEOs' Hometown Connections and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Emerging Market

The geographic distance of independent directors and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China

Multi-dimensional Corporate Social Responsibilities and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

CSR decoupling and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China

Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk: does analyst coverage matter?

Social capital, independent director connectedness, and stock price crash risk

Do corporate social responsibility reduce crash risk of stock price: evidence from China

Management geographical proximity and stock price crash risk

Corporate Pyramids and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Mandatory Information Disclosure and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from Private Firm-Visits in China

Risk disclosure and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Corporate social responsibility and stock-price crash risk: test of regulation mechanism based on institutional ownership and internal control

MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP AND STOCK PRICE CRASH RISK: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA

Bank Monitoring and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China

Principal–principal Agency Problems and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from the Split‐share Structure Reform in China

The provincial border, information costs, and stock price crash risk

Real earnings management, corporate governance and stock price crash risk: evidence from China

Leveraging corporate governance characteristics for stock crash risk assessment