SN 2020pvb: A Type IIn-P supernova with a precursor outburst

N. Elias-Rosa,S.J. Brennan,S. Benetti,E. Cappellaro,A. Pastorello,A. Kozyreva,P. Lundqvist,M. Fraser,J.P. Anderson,Y.-Z. Cai,T.-W. Chen,M. Dennefeld,M. Gromadzki,C.P. Guti'errez,N. Ihanec,C. Inserra,E. Kankare,R. Kotak,S. Mattila,S. Moran,T.E. Muller-Bravo,P.J. Pessi,G. Pignata,A. Reguitti,T.M. Reynolds,S.J. Smartt,K. Smith,L. Tartaglia,G. Valerin,T. de Boer,K. Chambers,A. Gal-Yam,H. Gao,S. Geier,P.A. Mazzali,M. Nicholl,F. Ragosta,A. Rest,O. Yaron,D.R. Young
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348790
2024-03-10
Abstract:We present photometric and spectroscopic datasets for a Type IIn-P supernova (SN) that is similar to SNe 1994W, 2005cl, 2009kn, and 2011ht, with a precursor outburst detected (PS1 $w$ band sim -13.8 mag) around four months before the $B$-band maximum light. presents a relatively bright light curve that peaked at $M_B$ = -17.95 pm 0.30 mag and a plateau that lasted at least 40 days before going into solar conjunction. After this, the object was no longer visible at phases $>$ 150 days above -12.5 mag in the $B$ band, suggesting that the ejecta interact with a dense, spatially confined circumstellar envelope. shows strong Balmer lines and a forest of Fe ii lines with narrow P Cygni profiles in its spectra. Using archival images from the Hubble Space Telescope, we constrained the progenitor of to have a luminosity of $ sun ruling out any single star progenitor over 50 $M_ sun$ is a Type IIn-P whose progenitor star had an outburst sim 0.5 yr before the final explosion; the material lost during this outburst probably plays a role in shaping the physical properties of the SN.
astronomy & astrophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?