Economic evaluations of establishing opioid overdose prevention centers in 12 North American cities: a systematic review

Czarina N Behrends,Jared A Leff,Weston Lowry,Jazmine M Li,Erica N Onuoha,Erminia Fardone,Ahmed M Bayoumi,Kathryn E McCollister,Sean M Murphy,Bruce R Schackman,Czarina N. Behrends,Jared A. Leff,Jazmine M. Li,Erica N. Onuoha,Ahmed M. Bayoumi,Kathryn E. McCollister,Sean M. Murphy,Bruce R. Schackman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.004
IF: 5.156
2024-02-01
Value in Health
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: Overdose prevention centers (OPCs) provide a safe place where people can consume preobtained drugs under supervision so that a life-saving medical response can be provided quickly in the event of an overdose. OPCs are programs that are established in Canada and have recently become legally sanctioned in only a few United States jurisdictions.METHODS: We conducted a systematic review that summarizes and identifies gaps of economic evidence on establishing OPCs in North America to guide future expansion of OPCs.RESULTS: We included 16 final studies that were evaluated with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards and Drummond checklists. Eight studies reported cost-effectiveness results (eg, cost per overdose avoided or cost per quality-adjusted life-year), with 6 also including cost-benefit; 5 reported only cost-benefit results, and 3 cost offsets. Health outcomes primarily included overdose mortality outcomes or HIV/hepatitis C virus infections averted. Most studies used mathematical modeling and projected OPC outcomes using the experience of a single facility in Vancouver, BC.CONCLUSIONS: OPCs were found to be cost-saving or to have favorable cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit ratios across all studies. Future studies should incorporate the experience of OPCs established in various settings and use a greater diversity of modeling designs.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services,economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?