Abstract:George Gamow’s liquid drop model of the nucleus can account for most of the terms in the formula and gives rough estimates for the values of the coefficients. Its semi-numerical equation was first formulated in 1935 by Weizsacker and in 1936 Bethe [1, 2], and although refinements have been made to the coefficients over the years, the structure of the formula remains the same today. Their formula gives a good approximation for atomic masses and several other effects, but does not explain the appearance of magic numbers of protons and neutrons, and the extra binding-energy and measure of stability that are associated with these numbers of nucleons. Mavrodiev and Deliyergiyev [3] formalized the nuclear mass problem in the inverse problem framework. This approach allowed them to infer the underlying model parameters from experimental observation, rather than to predict the observations from the model parameters. They formulated the inverse problem for the numerically generalized semi-empirical mass formula of Bethe and von Weizsacker going step-by-step through the AME2012 [4] nuclear database. The resulting parameterization described the measured nuclear masses of 2564 isotopes with a maximal deviation of less than 2.6 MeV, starting from the number of protons and number of neutrons equal to 1. The unknown functions in the generalized mass formula was discovered in a step-by-step way using the modified procedure realized in the algorithms developed by Aleksandrov [5-7] to solve nonlinear systems of equations via the Gauss-Newton method. In the presented herein article we describe a further development of the obtained by [3] formula by including additional factors,- magic numbers of protons, neutrons and electrons. This inclusion is based the well-known experimental data on the chemically induced polarization of nuclei and the effect of such this polarization on the rate of isotope decay. It allowed taking into account resonant interaction of the spins of nuclei and electron shells. As a result the maximal deviation from the measured nuclear masses of less than 1.9 MeV was reached. This improvement allowed prediction of the nuclear characteristics of the artificial elements 119 and 120.

Further improvements on a global nuclear mass model

An improved nuclear mass formula: WS3

An Improved Nuclear Mass Formula with a Unified Prescription for the Shell and Pairing Corrections

Improved Macroscopic Microscopic Mass Formula

A modified macroscopic-microscopic nuclear mass formula within considering isospin effect and continuum states

Nuclear mass predictions with radial basis function approach

Optimization of Nuclear Mass Models Using Algorithms and Neural Networks

Assessing the Impact of Nuclear Mass Models on the Prediction of Synthesis Cross Sections for Superheavy Elements

Simple Correction of Nuclear Mass Models

Performance of the Levenberg–Marquardt Neural Network Approach in Nuclear Mass Prediction

Refining the Nuclear Mass Model Via the Α Decay Energy

High Precision Nuclear Mass Predictions Towards a Hundred Kilo-Electron-volt Accuracy

Surface Diffuseness Correction in Global Mass Formula

Accuracy Versus Predictive Power in Nuclear Mass Tabulations

Basic Characteristics of Nuclear Landscape by Improved Weizsäcker-Skyrme-type Nuclear Mass Model

Simple Corrections in Theoretical Models of Atomic Masses and Nuclear Charge Radii

Nuclear mass predictions with the naive Bayesian model averaging method

Macroscopic-microscopic Calculations of Ground State Properties of Superheavy Nuclei

Improved Jänecke Mass Formula

Improved Numerical Generalization of the Bethe-Weizsäcker Mass Formula for Prediction the Isotope Nuclear Mass, the Mass Excess Including of Artificial Elements 119 and 120