Abstract:Predicting the structure of antibody-antigen complexes is a challenging task with significant implications for the design of better antibody therapeutics. However, the levels of success have remained dauntingly low, particularly when high standards for model quality are required, a necessity for efficient antibody design. Artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted the landscape of structure prediction for antibodies, both alone and in complex with their antigens. We utilized AI-guided antibody modeling tools to generate ensembles displaying diversity in the complementarity-determining region (CDR) and integrated those into our previously published AlphaFold2-rescored docking pipeline, a strategy called AI-augmented physics-based docking. We highlight that the quality of the ensemble is crucial for docking performance, that including too many models can be detrimental and that prioritization of models is essential for achieving good performance. In this study, we also compare docking performance with AlphaFold, the new benchmark in the field. We distinguish between two types of success tailored to specific downstream applications: 1) criteria sufficient for epitope mapping, where gross quality is adequate and can complement experimental techniques, and 2) criteria for producing higher-quality models suitable for engineering purposes. Our results robustly demonstrate the advantages of AI-augmented docking over AlphaFold2, further accentuated when higher standards in quality are imposed. Docking performance is noticeably lower than the one of AlphaFold3 in both epitope mapping and antibody design. While we observe a strong dependence on CDR-H3 length for physics-based tools on their ability to successfully predict, this helps define an applicability range where physics-based docking can be competitive to AlphaFold3.

A protocol for information-driven antibody-antigen modelling with the HADDOCK2.4 webserver

Towards the accurate modelling of antibody-antigen complexes from sequence using machine learning and information-driven docking

The HADDOCK2.4 web server for integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes

AI-Augmented Physics-Based Docking for Antibody-Antigen Complex Prediction

Information-driven modeling of biomolecular complexes

Modeling Protein-Glycan Interactions with HADDOCK

Computational Structure Prediction for Antibody-Antigen Complexes From Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: Challenges and Outlook

HDOCK: a web server for protein–protein and protein–DNA/RNA docking based on a hybrid strategy

ZDOCK server: interactive docking prediction of protein-protein complexes and symmetric multimers

Enhanced antibody-antigen structure prediction from molecular docking using AlphaFold2

The HDOCK server for integrated protein–protein docking

Antibody-Antigen Docking and Design via Hierarchical Equivariant Refinement

Integrative modeling in the age of machine learning: a summary of HADDOCK strategies in CAPRI rounds 47-55

Molecular Docking of Carbohydrate Ligands to Antibodies: Structural Validation against Crystal Structures

HDOCK update for modeling protein‐RNA/DNA complex structures

Modeling of protein-peptide interactions using the CABS-dock web server for binding site search and flexible docking

Antibodies: Computer-Aided Prediction of Structure and Design of Function

A Practical Guide to Molecular Docking and Homology Modelling for Medicinal Chemists

Cyclization and Docking Protocol for Cyclic Peptide–Protein Modeling Using HADDOCK2.4

IsAb: a computational protocol for antibody design

H3-OPT: Accurate prediction of CDR-H3 loop structures of antibodies with deep learning