The safety, acceptability, and success rates of amniocentesis in the context of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and threatened preterm labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Daniel J. ShortShreya ShethMeredith KelleherNishel M. ShahVictoria MaleSuhas KallapurAnna L. DavidMark R. Johnsona Department of Metabolism,Digestion,and Reproduction,Imperial College London,Chelsea and Westminster Hospital,London,UKb Division of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences,Oregon National Primate Research Centre,Oregon Health and Science University,Beaverton,OR,USAc Division of Neonatology and Developmental Biology,David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles,Los Angeles,CA,USAd Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health,University College London,London,UK
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2332784
2024-03-28
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Abstract:Introduction Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation, is the leading cause of death of children under the age of five years worldwide. Globally there has been no change in the preterm birth rate between 2010 and 2020, when rates were calculated to be 9.8% and 9.9% of all livebirths, respectively. The analysis of amniotic fluid has been advocated by many to identify the mechanisms driving threatened preterm labor. Amniocentesis is largely considered to be safe, but care provider concerns about complications in the setting of threatened preterm labor (tPTL) exist. This systematic review will critically review the data regarding safety and outcomes of amniocentesis in cases of PPROM and tPTL and help in the counseling and clinical decision-making of patients and care providers alike.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?