More than the clock: distinct regulation of muscle function and metabolism by PER2 and RORα
Shivani Mansingh,Geraldine Maier,Julien Delezie,Pål O. Westermark,Danilo Ritz,Wandrille Duchemin,Gesa Santos,Bettina Karrer‐Cardel,Stefan A. Steurer,Urs Albrecht,Christoph Handschin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp285585
2024-06-10
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend This study evaluates the functional and molecular consequences of modulating different regulatory loops of the muscle‐intrinsic clock, through extensive phenotypic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiling of the muscle around the clock. Overall, deletion of PER2 and RORα and, as a proxy, modulation of the primary or secondary feedback arms, leads to shared but distinct outcomes in terms of the transcriptome, proteome and phenotype. Perturbations of both the primary (PER2 MKO) and secondary arms (RORα MKO) of the core clock dampen the amplitude of expression of many clock and clock‐associated genes but do not affect their phase, thereby maintaining basic circadian oscillation in the muscle. The deletion of PER2 and RORα affects muscle metabolism and homeostasis in a circadian manner, through modulation of metabolic and mitochondrial genes, which encode proteins involved in amino acid metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and mitochondrial biogenesis, thereby affecting amino acid and ion homeostasis. As a result, glucose and lipid metabolism, in addition to amino acid metabolism, are impacted in these knockouts, highlighting the central role of the molecular clock in modulating muscle plasticity. ATP: adenosine triphosphate, ETC: electron transport chain. Circadian rhythms, governed by the dominant central clock, in addition to various peripheral clocks, regulate almost all biological processes, including sleep–wake cycles, hormone secretion and metabolism. In certain contexts, the regulation and function of the peripheral oscillations can be decoupled from the central clock. However, the specific mechanisms underlying muscle‐intrinsic clock‐dependent modulation of muscle function and metabolism remain unclear. We investigated the outcome of perturbations of the primary and secondary feedback loops of the molecular clock in skeletal muscle by specific gene ablation of Period circadian regulator 2 (Per2) and RAR‐related orphan receptor alpha (Rorα), respectively. In both models, a dampening of core clock gene oscillation was observed, while the phase was preserved. Moreover, both loops seem to be involved in the homeostasis of amine groups. Highly divergent outcomes were seen for overall muscle gene expression, primarily affecting circadian rhythmicity in the PER2 knockouts and non‐oscillating genes in the RORα knockouts, leading to distinct outcomes in terms of metabolome and phenotype. These results highlight the entanglement of the molecular clock and muscle plasticity and allude to specific functions of different clock components, i.e. the primary and secondary feedback loops, in this context. The reciprocal interaction between muscle contractility and circadian clocks might therefore be instrumental to determining a finely tuned adaptation of muscle tissue to perturbations in health and disease. Key points Specific perturbations of the primary and secondary feedback loop of the molecular clock result in specific outcomes on muscle metabolism and function. Ablation of Per2 (primary loop) or Rorα (secondary loop) blunts the amplitude of core clock genes, in absence of a shift in phase. Perturbation of the primary feedback loop by deletion of PER2 primarily affects muscle gene oscillation. Knockout of RORα and the ensuing modulation of the secondary loop results in the aberrant expression of a large number of non‐clock genes and proteins. The deletion of PER2 and RORα affects muscle metabolism and contractile function in a circadian manner, highlighting the central role of the molecular clock in modulating muscle plasticity.
neurosciences,physiology