Sustained remission induced by 2 years of treatment with benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and nasal polyposis

Corrado Pelaia,Claudia Crimi,Alida Benfante,Maria Filomena Caiaffa,Raffaele Campisi,Claudio Candia,Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano,Isabella Carrieri,Maria D'Amato,Aikaterini Detoraki,Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro,Nicola Lombardo,Luigi Macchia,Angelantonio Maglio,Elena Minenna,Santi Nolasco,Giuseppe Paglino,Francesco Papia,Luisa Ricciardi,Nicola Scichilone,Giulia Scioscia,Giuseppe Spadaro,Pasquale Tondo,Simona Uletta Lionetti,Giuseppe Valenti,Alessandro Vatrella,Nunzio Crimi,Girolamo Pelaia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14767
IF: 6.9
2024-06-08
Respirology
Abstract:This real‐life study recruited 164 patients with SEA. After 24 months of benralizumab treatment, 42.1% achieved sustained remission. During the same period, CRSwNP improvement was observed in 40.2% out of 82 subjects with concomitant nasal polyps. The latter comorbidity and reversibility of airflow limitation were independent predictors of sustained remission. Background and Objective Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that benralizumab is characterized by a good profile of efficacy and safety, thereby being potentially able to elicit clinical remission on‐treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). The main goal of this multicentre observational study was to verify the effectiveness of benralizumab in inducing a sustained remission on‐treatment of SEA in patients with or without comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Methods Throughout 2 years of treatment with benralizumab, a four‐component evaluation of sustained remission of SEA was performed, including the assessment of SEA exacerbations, use of oral corticosteroids (OCSs), symptom control and lung function. Results The present study recruited 164 patients suffering from SEA. After 24 months of add‐on biological therapy with benralizumab, 69 (42.1%) achieved the important target of sustained remission on‐treatment (exacerbation rate = 0, OCS dose = 0, pre‐bronchodilator FEV1 ≥80% pred., ACT score ≥ 20). During the same period, a persistent improvement of CRSwNP (SNOT‐22
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?