Risk assessment of metabolic syndrome prevalence involving sedentary occupations and socioeconomic status

Ming-Shu Chen,Chi-Hao Chiu,Shih-Hsin Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042802
IF: 3.006
2021-12-01
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objectives To determine whether occupation type, distinguished by socioeconomic status (SES) and sedentary status, is associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk. Methods We analysed two data sets covering 73 506 individuals. MetS was identified according to the criteria of the modified Adult Treatment Panel III. Eight occupational categories were considered: professionals, technical workers, managers, salespeople, service staff, administrative staff, manual labourers and taxi drivers; occupations were grouped into non-sedentary; sedentary, high-SES; and sedentary, non-high-SES occupations. A multiple logistic regression was used to determine significant risk factors for MetS in three age-stratified subgroups. R software for Windows (V.3.5.1) was used for all statistical analyses. Results MetS prevalence increased with age. Among participants aged ≤40 years, where MetS prevalence was low at 6.23%, having a non-sedentary occupation reduced MetS risk (OR=0.88, p 60 years, having a sedentary, high-SES occupation significantly increased (OR=1.39, p<0.0247) MetS risk. Conclusions The influence of occupation type on MetS risk differs among age groups. Non-sedentary occupations and sedentary, high-SES occupations decrease and increase MetS risk, respectively, among younger and older adults, respectively. Authorities should focus on individuals in sedentary, high-SES occupations.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?