Abstract:Study question: Can we develop a prediction model for the chance of a live birth following the transfer of an embryo created using donated oocytes? Summary answer: Three primary models that included patient, past treatment, and cycle characteristics were developed using Australian data to predict the chance of a live birth following the transfer of an embryo created using donated oocytes; these models were well-calibrated to the population studied, achieved reasonable predictive power and generalizability when tested on New Zealand data. What is known already: Nearly 9% of ART embryo transfer cycles performed globally use embryos created using donated oocytes. This percentage rises to one-quarter and one-half in same-sex couples and women aged over 45 years, respectively. Study design, size, duration: This study uses population-based Australian clinical registry data comprising 9384 embryo transfer cycles that occurred between 2015 and 2021 for model development, with an external validation cohort of 1493 New Zealand embryo transfer cycles. Participants/materials, setting, methods: Three prediction models were compared that incorporated patient characteristics, but differed in whether they considered use of prior autologous treatment factors and current treatment parameters. We internally validated the models on Australian data using grouped cross-validation and reported several measures of model discrimination and calibration. Variable importance was measured through calculating the change in predictive performance that resulted from variable permutation. The best-performing model was externally validated on data from New Zealand. Main results and the role of chance: The best-performing model had an internal validation AUC-ROC of 0.60 and Brier score of 0.20, and external validation AUC-ROC of 0.61 and Brier score of 0.23. While these results indicate ∼15% less discriminatory ability compared to models assessed on an autologous cohort from the same population the performance of the models was clearly statistically significantly better than random, demonstrated generalizability, and was well-calibrated to the population studied. The most important variables for predicting the chance of a live birth were the oocyte donor age, the number of prior oocyte recipient embryo transfer cycles, whether the transferred embryo was cleavage or blastocyst stage and oocyte recipient age. Of lesser importance were the oocyte-recipient parity, whether donor or partner sperm was used, the number of prior autologous embryo transfer cycles and the number of embryos transferred. Limitations, reasons for caution: The models had relatively weak discrimination suggesting further features need to be added to improve their predictive power. Variation in donor oocyte cohorts across countries due to differences such as whether anonymous and compensated donation are allowed may necessitate the models be recalibrated prior to application in non-Australian cohorts. Wider implications of the findings: These results confirm the well-established importance of oocyte age and ART treatment history as the key prognostic factors in predicting treatment outcomes. One of the developed models has been incorporated into a consumer-facing website (YourIVFSuccess.com.au/Estimator) to allow patients to obtain personalized estimates of their chance of success using donor oocytes. Study funding/competing interest(s): This research was funded by the Australian government as part of the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Emerging Priorities and Consumer Driven Research initiative: EPCD000007. L.R. declares personal consulting fees from Abbott and Merck, lecture fees from Abbott, receipt of an educational grant from Merck, past presidency of the Fertility Society of Australia & New Zealand and World Endometriosis Society and being a minor shareholder in Monash IVF Group (ASX:MVF). G.M.C. declares receipt of Australian government grant funding for the research study and the development and maintenance of the YourIVFSuccess website. O.F., J.N., and A.P. report no conflicts of interest. Trial registration number: N/A.

Modelling and comparing the use of IVF and ICSI in Australia

Development of a Model Predicting the Outcome of in Vitro Fertilization Cycles by a Robust Decision Tree Method

ICSI Does Not Improve Live Birth Rates but Yields Higher Cancellation Rates Than Conventional IVF in Unexplained Infertility

The Number of Previous Failed Embryo Transfer Cycles is an Independent Factor Affecting Implantation Rate in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI Treatment A Retrospective Cohort Study

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Versus Conventional In-Vitro Fertilisation for Couples with Infertility with Non-Severe Male Factor: a Multicentre, Open-Label, Randomised Controlled Trial

A Model for Pregnancy Rates after IVF-ET in Patients with Infertility and Endometriosis

Optimal control model for IVF treatment in women

Development of an IVF prediction model for donor oocytes: a retrospective analysis of 10 877 embryo transfers

Evaluating prognosis in unexplained infertility

How common is add-on use and how do patients decide whether to use them? A national survey of IVF patients

Predictors of success following IVF

Does in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment provide good value for money? A cost-benefit analysis

#244 : Reproductive Outcomes of Conventional in Vitro Fertilization and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Patients with Non-Severe Male Infertility Across Poor and Different Suboptimal Ovarian Response Categories

A comparative analysis of assisted reproductive technology cycles in Australia and New Zealand 2004-2007

"Comparison of Outcomes Between Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and In Vitro Fertilization with Pre-implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy, Analysis of SART CORS Data".

Role of In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) in Unexplained Infertility Management: A Systematic Review

AI-Based Optimal Treatment Strategy Selection for Female Infertility for First and Subsequent IVF-ET Cycles

The diversity of regulation and public financing of IVF in Europe and its impact on utilization

Making IVF more effective through the evolution of prediction models: is prognosis the missing piece of the puzzle?

Cost-effectiveness modelling of three different hysterosalpingography diagnostic strategies in addition to standard fertility management for couples with unexplained infertility in the United Kingdom

Reproductive outcomes of conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with non-severe male infertility across poor and different sub-optimal ovarian response categories: a cohort study based on 30352 fresh cycles from 2009-2019