Comparison of efficacy and safety of different types of one-way valves in endoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with severe lung emphysema.

Sgarbossa,T.,Borchers,P.,Saccomanno,J.,Wüstefeld,H.,Pappe,E.,Wülfing,U.,Klein,U.,Witzenrath,M.,Stanzel,F.,Grah,C.,Hübner,R.-H.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa4346
IF: 24.3
2024-11-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Two valve types have been established in the endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) of severe lung emphysema. These are the intrabronchial umbrella design (UD, Olympus®) and the endobronchial duckbill design (DD, Pulmonx®). The aim of this study is to compare the valve types regarding outcome and safety. Our data originates from three german lung empyhsema centers and was collected in a prospective observational study focusing on lung volume reduction. Two groups were formed depending on the valve type. In both groups, lung function (FEV1, RV, pCO2), 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), quality of life (SGRQ, CAT), and rate of serious adverse events were recorded at baseline and after three months. A total of 52 patients with a UD and 99 with a DD were treated. Of these, 33 with UD- and 81 with DD-valves received a follow-up. At baseline the DD-group presented with significantly more heterogenous emphysema and a higher RV. Table 1 shows that there were no significant differences between both groups in the delta between baseline and follow-up. For both valves, pneumothorax was the most common adverse event (UD: 4 (8%) vs DD: 11 (11%); p=0.580). We saw no significant difference between the two groups in outcome or serious adverse events three months after ELVR in a real clinical setting. The selection of valve types should be based on the individual bronchial anatomy.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?