Abstract:Abstract Introduction Transobturator male urethral slings are a surgical option for the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Historically, patient continence and satisfaction rates are influenced by several variables, including: baseline incontinence severity, prior surgical interventions, and exposure to radiation. Ideal or “standard” patients for sling placement have mild or moderate incontinence and no prior incontinence procedures or radiation exposure. Standard patients have been proposed to have better postoperative continence and satisfaction rates than their “nonstandard” counterparts. Objective In this study we sought to compare the efficacy and complication rates of transobturator male sling placement between standard and nonstandard patients. Methods A retrospective, single-institution review was performed of all patients who underwent either an AdVanceTM or an AdVanceXPTM sling insertion between October 2016 and May 2023. Patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative continence rates, and complication rates were collected. Patients were then stratified as “standard’ vs “nonstandard”. Standard patients were defined as having a history of radical prostatectomy (robotic or open) and no prior radiation or prior incontinence procedure. Nonstandard patients had prior history of transurethral resection of the prostate, simple prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, prior sling insertion, or prior radiation. The continence and complication rates were compared between groups. Continence was measured in pads per day (PPD). Improvement in continence was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in PPD at 6 weeks postoperatively. Baseline and postoperative PPD were tabulated with median and 25th-75th percentiles, then compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Other variables were summarized with frequency and percentages, and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results 62 patients were included in this study, of which 48 and 14 were standard and nonstandard, respectively. Mean age was 66 (52-85) years and body mass index (BMI) was 29 (20.3-39.8) kg/m2. No difference in baseline characteristics were noted between the groups (Table 1). 77% of patients had an improvement in SUI following sling placement: 38/48 (79%) patients in the standard group and 10/14 (71%) patients in the non standard group. The most common complication among both groups was urinary retention requiring catheterization (29%), which resolved spontaneously within two weeks in all patients. In the nonstandard group, one patient developed an abscess, one had a scrotal hematoma, and two patients had urinary tract infections (UTI). One patient with history of radiation developed a urethrocutaneous fistula requiring sling removal. There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between standard and nonstandard patients. Comparable rates of improvement in preoperative to postoperative SUI were noted: 2.5 to 0.8 PPD in the standard group and 3.3 to 1.0 PPD in the nonstandard group (Figure 1). Conclusions In this study, nonstandard and standard patients had similar continence and complication rates following urethral sling placement. Future prospective studies are warranted to assess the safety and long-term outcomes of standard and nonstandard patients. Disclosure No.

Impact of Sling at Time of Prolapse Surgery on Overactive Bladder

Adjustable Single-Incision Mini-Slings (ajust®) Versus Other Slings in Surgical Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Complications.

Comparison of Various Methods in the Sling Adjustment in Stress Urinary Incontinence Surgery

Risk Factors for De Novo Overactive Bladder After Midurethral Sling

Active Compared With Passive Voiding Trials After Midurethral Sling Surgery

Study on the Effectiveness of Transobturator Tension-Free Tape and Retropubic-Mid-urethral Sling in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Ultrasound for Assessing Transobturator Tape Sling Procedure.

Combined Prolapse and Midurethral Sling Surgery Versus Prolapse Surgery for Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence:A Meta-analysis

Synthetic versus non-synthetic slings for female stress and mixed urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A comparative study on two surgical procedures in treatment of stress urinary incontinence in old women

An update on surgical management for stress urinary incontinence

A New Surgery for Recurrent or Persist Stress Urinary Incontinence in Females after Primary Mid-Urethral Slings.

A randomized trial of retropubic versus single-incision sling amongst patients undergoing vaginal prolapse repair

Long-term Outcomes of Surgical Interventions for Stress Urinary Incontinence: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

[Sling Suspension: a New Technique of Treating Uterine Prolapse].

(211) Comparable Continence Rates Following Male Urethral Sling Surgery in “Standard” versus “Nonstandard” Patients

Urinary incontinence after surgical repair in patients with pelvic organprolapse.

Continence Is Not Affected after Sling Revision with Transvaginal Tape Elongation for Post-Sling Voiding Dysfunction

Adjustable slings versus other surgical methods in female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Prior male sling does not affect outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Prospective Comparative Analysis between Bulking Agent and Single-Incision Sling