Comparison of online, offline, and hybrid hypotheses of motor sequence learning using a quantitative model that incorporate reactive inhibition

Mohan W. Gupta,Timothy C. Rickard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52726-9

IF: 4.6

2024-02-27

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Two hypotheses have been advanced for when motor sequence learning occurs: offline between bouts of practice or online concurrently with practice. A third possibility is that learning occurs both online and offline. A complication for differentiating between those hypotheses is a process known as reactive inhibition, whereby performance worsens over consecutively executed sequences, but dissipates during breaks. We advance a new quantitative modeling framework that incorporates reactive inhibition and in which the three learning accounts can be implemented. Our results show that reactive inhibition plays a far larger role in performance than is appreciated in the literature. Across four groups of participants in which break times and correct sequences per trial were varied, the best overall fits were provided by a hybrid model. The version of the offline model that does not account for reactive inhibition, which is widely assumed in the literature, had the worst fits. We discuss implications for extant hypotheses and directions for future research.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the timing of motor sequence learning. Specifically, the researchers proposed two hypotheses: one is that motor sequence learning occurs offline (i.e., during the practice interval); the other is that it occurs online (i.e., during the practice process). In addition, there is also a hybrid hypothesis which holds that learning occurs both online and offline. However, a complicating factor in distinguishing these hypotheses is a phenomenon called reactive inhibition (RI), that is, the performance of consecutively executed sequences will deteriorate, but this effect will disappear during the rest period.

To better understand these hypotheses, the researchers developed a new quantitative modeling framework that incorporates reactive inhibition and can implement the above - mentioned three learning accounts. The main finding of the study is that the impact of reactive inhibition on performance is much greater than recognized in the literature. By analyzing four groups of participants with different rest times and changes in the number of correct sequences per trial, the study found that the hybrid model provided the best overall fit. In particular, the offline model that does not consider reactive inhibition (widely assumed in the literature) had the worst fit.

The researchers further discussed the implications of these findings for existing hypotheses and the direction of future research. By introducing the concept of reactive inhibition, this paper provides a new perspective to explain the process of motor sequence learning, challenging the traditionally held view that learning mainly occurs during the rest period.